The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic acidosis stimulates protein degradation in rat muscle by a glucocorticoid-dependent mechanism.
Open accessAbstract
Metabolic acidosis is associated with enhanced renal ammonia-genesis which is regulated, in part, by glucocorticoids. The interaction between glucocorticoids and chronic metabolic acidosis on nitrogen utilization and muscle protein metabolism is unknown. In rats pair-fed by gavage, we found that chronic acidosis stunted growth and caused a 43% increase in urinary nitrogen and an 87% increase in urinary corticosterone. Net protein degradation in incubated epitrochlearis muscles from chronically acidotic rats was stimulated at all concentrations of insulin from 0 to 10(4) microU/ml. This effect of acidosis persisted despite supplementation of the media with amino acids with or without insulin, indomethacin, and inhibitors of lysosomal thiol cathepsins. Acidosis did not change protein synthesis; hence, the increase in net protein degradation was caused by stimulation of proteolysis. Acidosis did not increase glutamine production in muscle. The protein catabolic effect of acidosis required glucocorticoids; protein degradation was stimulated in muscle of acidotic, adrenalectomized rats only if they were treated with dexamethasone. Moreover, when nonacidotic animals were given 3 micrograms/100 g of body weight dexamethasone twice a day, muscle protein degradation was increased if the muscles were simply incubated in acidified media. We conclude that chronic metabolic acidosis depresses nitrogen utilization and increases glucocorticoid production. The combination of increased glucocorticoids and acidosis stimulates muscle proteolysis but does not affect protein synthesis. These changes in muscle protein metabolism may play a role in the defense against acidosis by providing amino acid nitrogen to support the glutamine production necessary for renal ammoniagenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carrero, J. J., Stenvinkel, P., Cuppari, L., Ikizler, T. A., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kaysen, G., Mitch, W. E., Price, S. R., Wanner, C., Wang, A. Y. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Renal Nutrition · doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2013.01.001 · Cited by 939
Self-citationLecker, S. H., Solomon, V., Mitch, W. E., & Goldberg, A. L. (1999) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/129.1.227s · Cited by 732
Self-citationMyostatin/activin pathway antagonism: molecular basis and therapeutic potential
Han, H. Q., Zhou, X., Mitch, W. E., & Goldberg, A. L. (2013) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.019 · Cited by 314
Self-citationMetabolic Acidosis of CKD: An Update
Kraut, J. A., & Madias, N. E. (2016) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.08.028 · Cited by 314
Protein nutrition and malnutrition in CKD and ESRD
Zha, Y., & Qian, Q. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9030208 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- May, R. C., Kelly, R. A., & Mitch, W. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1986-02-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 614-621
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146854188
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic acidosis stimulates protein degradation in rat muscle by a glucocorticoid-dependent mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci112344
- The paper
- May, R. C., Kelly, R. A., & Mitch, W. E. (1986). Metabolic acidosis stimulates protein degradation in rat muscle by a glucocorticoid-dependent mechanism. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci112344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.