Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,072

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapeutic advantage of converting enzyme inhibitors in arresting progressive renal disease associated with systemic hypertension in the rat.

Open access
Anderson, S, Rennke, H G, Brenner, B M·1986·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Micropuncture and morphologic studies were performed in six groups of male Munich-Wistar rats after removal of the right kidney and segmental infarction of two-thirds of the left kidney.Groups I and 4 received no specific therapy.Groups 2 and 5 were treated with the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, 50 mg/liter, in the drinking water.Groups 3 and 6 were treated with reserpine (5 mg/liter), hydralazine (80 mg/ liter), and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/liter).All rats were fed standard chow.Groups 1-3 underwent micropuncture study 4 wk after renal ablation.Untreated group 1 rats exhibited systemic hypertension and elevation of the single nephron glomerular fil- tration rate (SNGFR) due to high average values for the mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure gradient (AP) and glomerular plasma flow rate (QAJ.In group 2 rats, treatment with enalapril prevented systemic hypertension and maintained AP at near-normal levels without significant reduction in SNGFR and QA.In contrast, triple drug therapy normalized systemic hypertension, but failed to lower AP in group 3 rats.Groups 4- 6 were followed for 12 wk after renal ablation.Untreated group 4 rats demonstrated continuous systemic hypertension, progressive proteinuria, and glomerular structural lesions, including mesangial expansion and frequent areas of segmental sclerosis.In group 5 rats, treatment with enalapril maintained systemic blood pressure at normal levels over the 12-wk period and dra- matically limited the development of proteinuria and glomerular lesions.Despite equivalent systemic blood pressure control in group 6 rats, failure of triple drug therapy to control glomerular hypertension was associated with progressive proteinuria and glomerular lesions comparable to those seen in untreated group 4 rats.Thus, unless glomerular capillary hypertension is corrected, control of systemic blood pressure is insufficient to prevent progressive renal injury in rats with reduced renal mass. 1. Abbreviations used in this paper.Al, angiotensin I; AP, mean arterial pressure under anesthesia; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; Hct, hema- tocrit; Kf, glomerular capillary ultrafiltration coefficient; AP, mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference; PGC, mean glo- merular capillary hydraulic pressure; QA, glomerular capillary plasma flow rate; SN, single nephron; SNGFR, single nephron glomerular fil- tration rate.Hypertension and Glomerular Injury in Rats 1993

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci112528

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,072

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, S., Rennke, H. G., & Brenner, B. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1986-06-01
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1993-2000
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031534703
Cited by
1,072
References
1
FWCI
28.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.