Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gram-negative bacteremia produces both severe systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction in a canine model that simulates human septic shock.

Open access
Natanson, C, Fink, M P, Ballantyne, H K, MacVittie, T J, Conklin, J J, Parrillo, J E·1986·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

A canine sepsis model that simulates the human cardiovascular response to septic shock was produced in 10 conscious unsedated dogs by implanting an Eschichia coli-infected clot into the peri- toneum, resulting in bacteremia.By employing serial, simulta- neous measurements of radionuclide scan-determined left ven- tricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and thermodilution cardiac index (CI), the end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) was calculated (EDVI = stroke volume index + EF).By using three different methods of quantifying serial ventricular performance (EF, shifts in the Starling ventricular function curve using EDVI vs. stroke work index, and the ventricular function curve response to volume infusion), this study provides evidence (P < 0.01) that septic shock produces a profound, but reversible, decrease in systolic ventricular performance.This decreased performance was not seen in controls and was associated with ventricular dilatation (P < 0.01); the latter response was dependent on an adequate volume infusion.Further studies of EDVI and pulmonary cap- illary wedge pressure during diastole revealed a significant, though reversible, shift (P < 0.001) in the diastolic volume/ pressure (or compliance) relationship during septic shock.Portions of this work were presented at the National Meeting of the American Federation for Clinical Research, Washington, DC (1985).The opinions and assertions contained in this article are the private ones of the authors, are not to be construed as official, or reflecting the views of the Armed Forces of the United States of America.The exper- iments reported herein were conducted according to the principles set forth in the "Guide for the Care and Use ofLaboratory Animals," Institute

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci112559

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Natanson, C., Fink, M. P., Ballantyne, H. K., MacVittie, T. J., Conklin, J. J., & Parrillo, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1986-07-01
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
259-270
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994818796
Cited by
257
References
0
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gram-negative bacteremia produces both severe systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction in a canine model that simulates human septic shock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci112559
The paper
Natanson, C., Fink, M. P., Ballantyne, H. K., MacVittie, T. J., Conklin, J. J., & Parrillo, J. E. (1986). Gram-negative bacteremia produces both severe systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction in a canine model that simulates human septic shock. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci112559

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.