The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms underlying regional differences in lipolysis in human adipose tissue.
Open accessAbstract
Catecholamine-induced lipolysis was investigated in nonobese females and males. Isolated subcutaneous adipocytes were obtained from the abdominal and gluteal regions. The lipolytic effect of noradrenaline was four to fivefold more marked in abdominal adipocytes than in gluteal fat cells. This regional difference was more apparent in females than in males. No site differences were observed when lipolysis was stimulated with agents acting at different postreceptor levels. The beta-adrenergic lipolytic sensitivity was 10-20 times greater in abdominal adipocytes from both sexes than in gluteal adipocytes. Abdominal adipocytes from females showed a 40 times lower alpha 2-adrenergic antilipolytic sensitivity than did gluteal adipocytes, but the adenosine receptor sensitivity was similar in both sites. Beta-receptor affinity for agonists displayed no site or sex variation. Abdominal adipocytes showed a twofold increased beta-adrenoceptor density than did gluteal cells from both sexes. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor density was similar in all regions, but in females the affinity of clonidine for these sites was 10-15 times lower in the abdominal fat cells compared with gluteal cells. In conclusion, regional differences in catecholamine-induced lipolysis are regulated at the adrenoceptor level, chiefly because of site variations in beta-adrenoceptor density. Further variations in the affinity properties of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor in females may explain why the regional differences in catecholamine-induced lipolysis are more pronounced in women than in men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forskolin: unique diterpene activator of adenylate cyclase in membranes and in intact cells.
Seamon, K. B., Padgett, W., & Daly, J. W. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3363 · Cited by 1,658
Cited by
Sex differences in human adipose tissues – the biology of pear shape
Karastergiou, K., Smith, S. R., Greenberg, A. S., & Fried, S. K. (2012) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-13 · Cited by 1,109
Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity
Dietz, W. (1994) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.5.955 · Cited by 1,069
Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health
Manolopoulos, K. N., Karpe, F., & Frayn, K. N. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.286 · Cited by 811
Bugianesi, E., Gastaldelli, A., Vanni, E., Gambino, R., Cassader, M., Baldi, S., Ponti, V., Pagano, G., Ferrannini, E., & Rizzetto, M. (2005) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-005-1682-x · Cited by 770
Gender differences in fat metabolism
Blaak, E. (2001) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/00075197-200111000-00006 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahrenberg, H., Lönnqvist, F., & Arner, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1989-08-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 458-467
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160565685
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms underlying regional differences in lipolysis in human adipose tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci114187
- The paper
- Wahrenberg, H., Lönnqvist, F., & Arner, P. (1989). Mechanisms underlying regional differences in lipolysis in human adipose tissue. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci114187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.