Cited by 769Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepDysphagia Assessment and Management

Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls (a neuromuscular compensatory mechanism).

Open access
Mezzanotte, W S, Tangel, D J, White, D P·1992·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Pharyngeal collapse in obstructive sleep apnea patients is likely a product of a sleep-related decrement in pharyngeal dilator muscle activity superimposed upon abnormal airway anatomy. We postulate that during wakefulness, increased pharyngeal dilator muscle activity in apnea patients compensates for diminished airway size thus maintaining patency. We studied the waking genioglossus (GG) electromyogram (EMG) activity in 11 OSA patients and 14 age-matched controls to determine if GG activity is higher in the awake state in apnea patients than controls. To make this determination, we developed a reproducible methodology whereby true maximal GG EMG could be defined and thus basal activity quantitated as a percentage of this maximal value. Therefore, direct comparisons of basal activity between individuals was possible. We observed apnea patients to have significantly greater basal genioglossal activity compared to controls (40.6 +/- 5.6% vs. 12.7 +/- 1.7% of maximum). This difference persisted when size-matched subsets were compared. This augmented GG activity in apnea patients could be reduced with positive airway pressure. We speculate that this neuromuscular compensation present during wakefulness in apnea patients may be lost during sleep leading to airway collapse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci115751

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obesity, specifically central adiposity, increases pharyngeal collapsibility that causes recurrent episodes of upper airway obstruction in sleep apnea through mechanical and neuromuscular effects.

    “Obesity, specifically central adiposity, increases pharyngeal collapsibility that causes recurrent episodes of UA obstruction in sleep apnea through both mechanical and neuromuscular effects.199–203”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page not specified) describe pharyngeal collapse in sleep apnea as involving airway anatomy and dilator-muscle activity, supporting the mechanical and neuromuscular portion of the claim. The Methods compare patients with obese, size-matched controls, but the paper does not establish that obesity—specifically central adiposity—increases collapsibility or causes recurrent obstruction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Through protective upper airway dilator muscle reflexes, muscle activity is increased during wakefulness in OSA compared to matched controls.

    “Through protective UA dilator muscle reflexes, the activity of the muscles is increased during wakefulness in OSA compared to matched controls.201”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Abstract reports significantly greater waking genioglossus activity in OSA patients than in age-matched controls, with the difference persisting in size-matched subsets. The Introduction and later discussion propose a protective reflex response to negative airway pressure, but describe that mechanism as theoretical or speculative rather than established; the study measured the genioglossus, not upper-airway dilator muscles generally. No page number is provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mezzanotte, W. S., Tangel, D. J., & White, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Denver VA Medical Center (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1992-05-01
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
1571-1579
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139404323
Cited by
769
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-07085, T32HL007085)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, genioglossus muscle, pharyngeal dilator muscles, neuromuscular compensation, pharyngeal collapse, airway patency, positive airway pressure, wakefulness
MeSH terms
Electromyography, Humans, Male, Pharynx, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review