The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces.
Open accessAbstract
Focal adhesion sites were observed in cultured endothelial cells by tandem scanning confocal microscopy and digitized image analysis, techniques that provide real-time images of adhesion site area and topography in living cells. Image subtraction demonstrated that in the presence of unidirectional steady laminar flow (shear stress [tau] = 10 dyn/cm2) a substantial fraction of focal adhesion sites remodeled in the direction of flow. In contrast, focal adhesions of control (no flow) cells remodeled without preferred direction. In confluent monolayers subjected to shear stresses of 10 dyn/cm2, cells began to realign in the direction of flow after 7-9 h. This was accompanied by redistribution of intracellular stress fibers, alignment of individual focal adhesion sites, and the coalescence of smaller sites resulting in fewer, but larger, focal adhesions per cell. Cell adhesion, repeatedly calculated in the same cells as a function of the areas of focal contact and the separation distances between membrane and substratum, varied by < 10% during both short (30 min), or prolonged (< or = 24 h), periods of exposure to flow. Consistent with these measurements, the gains and losses of focal adhesion area as each site remodeled were approximately equivalent. When the glass substratum was coated with gelatin, rates of remodeling were inhibited by 47% during flow (tau = 10 dyn/cm2). These studies: (a) reveal the dynamic nature of focal adhesion; (b) demonstrate that these sites at the ablumenal endothelial membrane are both acutely and chronically responsive to frictional shear stress forces applied to the opposite (lumenal) cell surface; and (c) suggest that components of the focal adhesion complex may be mechanically responsive elements coupled to the cytoskeleton.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction
Davies, P. F. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.519 · Cited by 2,802
Self-citationChiu, J.-J., & Chien, S. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00047.2009 · Cited by 2,280
Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again
Ingber, D. E. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-5424rev · Cited by 1,627
Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain
Duncan, R. L., & Turner, C. H. (1995) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf00302070 · Cited by 1,048
Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells
Li, Y.-S. J., Haga, J. H., & Chien, S. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.030 · Cited by 904
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, P. F., Robotewskyj, A., & Griem, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1994-05-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2031-2038
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077080519
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci117197
- The paper
- Davies, P. F., Robotewskyj, A., & Griem, M. L. (1994). Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci117197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.