Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Familial ligand-defective apolipoprotein B. Identification of a new mutation that decreases LDL receptor binding affinity.

Open access
Pullinger, C R, Hennessy, L K, Chatterton, J E, Liu, W, Love, J A, Mendel, C M, Frost, P H, Malloy, M J, Schumaker, V N, Kane, J P·1995·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Detection of new ligand-defective mutations of apolipopro- tein B (apoB) will enable identification of sequences in- volved in binding to the LDL receptor.Genomic DNA from patients attending a lipid clinic was screened by singlestrand conformation polymorphism analysis for novel muta- tions in the putative LDL receptor-binding domain of apoB-100.A 46-yr-old woman of Celtic and Native Ameri- can ancestry with primary hypercholesterolemia (total cho- lesterol [TC] 343 mg/dl; LDL cholesterol [LDL-C] 241 mg/ dl) and pronounced peripheral vascular disease was found to be heterozygous for a novel Arg3531-Cys mutation, caused by a C-T transition at nucleotide 10800.One unrelated 59yr-old man of Italian ancestry was found with the same mutation after screening 1,560 individuals.He had coronary heart disease, a TC of 310 mg/dl, and an LDL-C of 212 mg/ dl.A total of eight individuals were found with the defect in the families of the two patients.They had an age-and sex-adjusted TC of 240±14 mg/dl and LDL-C of 169±+10 mg/dl.This compares with eight unaffected family members with age-and sex-adjusted TC of 185±12 mg/dl and LDL- C of 124±+12 mg/dl.In a dual-label fibroblast binding assay, LDL from the eight subjects with the mutation had an affin- ity for the LDL receptor that was 63% that of control LDL.LDL from eight unaffected family members had an affinity of 91%.By way of comparison, LDL from six patients het- erozygous for the Arg3500-Gln mutation had an affinity of 36%.The percentage mass ratio of the defective Cys3531 LDL to normal LDL was 59:41, as determined using the mAb MB19 and dynamic laser light scattering.Thus, the defec- tive LDL had accumulated in the plasma of these patients.Using this mass ratio, it was calculated that the defective Cys353, LDL particles bound with 27% of normal affinity.Deduced haplotypes using 10 apoB gene markers showed

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci117772

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Pullinger, C. R., Hennessy, L. K., Chatterton, J. E., Liu, W., Love, J. A., Mendel, C. M., Frost, P. H., Malloy, M. J., Schumaker, V. N., & Kane, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1995-03-01
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
1225-1234
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102926989
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familial ligand-defective apolipoprotein B. Identification of a new mutation that decreases LDL receptor binding affinity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci117772
The paper
Pullinger, C. R., Hennessy, L. K., Chatterton, J. E., Liu, W., Love, J. A., Mendel, C. M., Frost, P. H., Malloy, M. J., Schumaker, V. N., & Kane, J. P. (1995). Familial ligand-defective apolipoprotein B. Identification of a new mutation that decreases LDL receptor binding affinity. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci117772

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.