Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo glucosamine infusion induces insulin resistance in normoglycemic but not in hyperglycemic conscious rats.

Open access
Rossetti, L, Hawkins, M, Chen, W, Gindi, J, Barzilai, N·1995·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that increased flux through the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway can induce insulin resistance in skeletal muscle in vivo, we monitored glucose uptake, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis during insulin clamp studies in 6-h fasted conscious rats in the presence of a sustained (7-h) increase in glucosamine (GlcN) availability. Euglycemic (approximately 7 mM) insulin (approximately 2,500 pM) clamps with saline or GlcN infusions were performed in control (CON; plasma glucose [PG] = 7.4 +/- 0.2 mM), diabetic (D; PG = 19.7 +/- 1.1), and phlorizin-treated (3-wk) diabetic rats (D + PHL; PG = 7.6 +/- 0.9). 7-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemia with saline did not significantly decrease Rd (360-420 min = 39.2 +/- 3.6 vs. 60-120 min = 42.2 +/- 3.7 mg/kg.min; P = NS). GlcN infusion raised plasma GlcN concentrations to approximately 1.2 mM and increased muscle and liver UDP-GlcNAc levels by 4-5-fold in all groups. GlcN markedly decreased Rd in CON (360-420 min = 30.4 +/- 1.3 vs. 60-120 min = 44.1 +/- 3.5 mg/kg.min; P < 0.01) and D + PHL (360-420 min = 29.4 +/- 2.5 vs. 60-120 min = 43.8 +/- 2.9 mg/kg.min; P < 0.01), but not in D (5-7 h = 21.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 0-2 h = 24.3 +/- 1.1 mg/kg.min; P = NS). Thus, increased GlcN availability induces severe skeletal muscle insulin resistance in normoglycemic but not in chronically hyperglycemic rats. The lack of additive effects of GlcN and chronic hyperglycemia (experimental diabetes) provides support for the hypothesis that increased flux through the GlcN pathway in skeletal muscle may play an important role in glucose-induced insulin resistance in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci118013

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Rossetti, L., Hawkins, M., Chen, W., Gindi, J., & Barzilai, N.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
132-140
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114508339
Cited by
264
References
40
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo glucosamine infusion induces insulin resistance in normoglycemic but not in hyperglycemic conscious rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci118013
The paper
Rossetti, L., Hawkins, M., Chen, W., Gindi, J., & Barzilai, N. (1995). In vivo glucosamine infusion induces insulin resistance in normoglycemic but not in hyperglycemic conscious rats. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci118013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.