Cited by 281Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsImmunotherapy and Immune Responsesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Direct, MHC-dependent presentation of the drug sulfamethoxazole to human alphabeta T cell clones.

Open access
Schnyder, B, Mauri-Hellweg, D, Zanni, M, Bettens, F, Pichler, W J·1997·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

T cells can recognize small molecular compounds like drugs. It is thought that covalent binding to MHC bound peptides is required for such a hapten stimulation. Sulfamethoxazole, like most drugs, is not chemically reactive per se, but is thought to gain the ability to covalently bind to proteins after intracellular drug metabolism. The purpose of this study was to investigate how sulfamethoxazole is presented in an immunogenic form to sulfamethoxazole-specific T cell clones. The stimulation of four CD4(+) and two CD8(+) sulfamethoxazole-specific T cell clones by different antigen-presenting cells (APC) was measured both by proliferation and cytolytic assays. The MHC restriction was evaluated, first, by inhibition using anti-class I and anti-class II mAb, and second, by the degree of sulfamethoxazole-induced stimulation by partially matched APC. Fixation of APC was performed with glutaraldehyde 0.05%. The clones were specific for sulfamethoxazole without cross-reaction to other sulfonamides. The continuous presence of sulfamethoxazole was required during the assay period since pulsing of the APC was not sufficient to induce proliferation or cytotoxicity. Stimulation of clones required the addition of MHC compatible APC. The APC could be fixed without impairing their ability to present sulfamethoxazole. Sulfamethoxazole can be presented in an unstable, but MHC-restricted fashion, which is independent of processing. These features are best explained by a direct, noncovalent binding of sulfamethoxazole to the MHC-peptide complex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci119505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnyder, B., Mauri-Hellweg, D., Zanni, M., Bettens, F., & Pichler, W. J.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Pichler, W J
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
136-141
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995968109
Cited by
281
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
sulfamethoxazole, drug immunogenicity, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, antigen-presenting cells, glutaraldehyde fixation
MeSH terms
Antigen-Presenting Cells, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Line, Cell Transformation, Viral, Clone Cells, Cytotoxicity, Immunologic, Drug Hypersensitivity, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Haptens, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Sulfamethoxazole, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Antigens, CD, CD4 Antigens, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta, CD8 Antigens, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review