Cited by 141Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsImmunotoxicology and immune responsesContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Covalent binding of the nitroso metabolite of sulfamethoxazole leads to toxicity and major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen presentation

Naisbitt, Dean J., Farrell, John, Gordon, S. Fraser, Maggs, James L., Burkhart, Christoph, Pichler, Werner J., Pirmohamed, Munir, Park, B. Kevin·2002·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

Treatment with sulfamethoxazole (SMX) can lead to hypersensitivity reactions. T cells from hypersensitive patients recognize either the parent drug and/or the reactive nitroso (SMX-NO) metabolite. In this study, using a novel in vitro rat splenocyte assay, we have investigated the toxicological and immunological consequences of cell surface haptenation by SMX-NO. SMX-NO was found to be unstable in solution; spontaneous transformation yielded appreciable amounts of SMX-hydroxylamine, nitro-SMX, and the previously unknown azoxy and azo dimers within 15 min. Irreversible binding of SMX-NO to cellular protein was demonstrated by flow cytometry, with haptenation being greater on the surface of antigen-presenting cells than on T cells. The consequences of irreversible binding of SMX-NO were examined in two ways. First, haptenation above a threshold level led to a proportionate increase in cell death (both apoptosis and necrosis). Indeed, the cells that became haptenated were the same as those that underwent necrotic cell death. Second, sensitized splenocytes proliferated in the presence of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted antigen derived from both viable and dead cells haptenated with low and high levels of SMX-NO, respectively. However, direct modification of MHC by SMX-NO was not the mechanism of antigen presentation. The antigenic threshold of SMX-NO for T-cell proliferation and toxicity was estimated to be between 0.5 and 1 microM and 5 to 10 microM, respectively. The potential of SMX-NO to generate a potent antigen and cause cytotoxicity may in combination provide the signals necessary to induce a hypersensitivity reaction to SMX.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/mol.62.3.628

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naisbitt, D. J., Farrell, J., Gordon, S. F., Maggs, J. L., Burkhart, C., Pichler, W. J., Pirmohamed, M., & Park, B. K.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
628-637
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166901508
Cited by
141
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of Liverpool
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
sulfamethoxazole, drug hypersensitivity, haptenation, covalent binding, T cell proliferation, necrosis, apoptosis, antigen-presenting cells, drug toxicity, immunotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Cell Division, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Male, Nitroso Compounds, Rats, Inbred Lew, Sulfamethoxazole, T-Lymphocytes, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review