Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspirin use and potential mechanisms for colorectal cancer prevention.

Open access
Williams, C S, Smalley, W, DuBois, R N·1997·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Disease prevention is receiving more attention in the United States today. This welcome trend is largely a result of two economic forces: The increased level of support for prevention research by the National Institutes of Health (Healthy People 2000), and the potential payoff of prevention research in cutting the health care costs of managing patients with end-stage diseases. Indeed, the efficacy of preventive measures for many chronic diseases (such as heart disease and cancer) are being evaluated with the full expectation that mortality and morbidity—and perhaps health care costs—will decrease. One example of recent cancer prevention research indicates that there may be a 40–50% reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer in persons who take aspirin or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 1 on a regular basis. It is clear that an effect of this magnitude would have a significant impact on both the number of lives saved and on the health care dollars recovered. Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in Western civilizations, claiming about 55,000 lives in the United States this year alone. Americans have a 1 in 20 lifetime risk of developing this disease, and z 1 in 10 have a family member who develops colorectal cancer. Initially, it was hoped that early detection would reduce these high numbers. However, despite recent evidence that early detection by fecal occult blood tests and flexible sigmoidoscopy can decrease the risk of colorectal cancer death by 20–30%, most people do not undergo appropriate screening. Therefore, a number of laboratories have initiated research efforts focused on understanding the molecular basis of the potential chemoprotective effects resulting from aspirin and other NSAID use. It is hoped that this approach, in conjunction with more rigorous clinical trials, will lead to a rationale design for future colorectal cancer prevention regimens. This Perspectives article considers both the clinical and the basic research efforts underway this year, the 100th anniversary of the discovery of aspirin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci119651

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Williams, C. S., Smalley, W., & DuBois, R. N.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1997-09-15
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
1325-1329
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090106927
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspirin use and potential mechanisms for colorectal cancer prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci119651
The paper
Williams, C. S., Smalley, W., & DuBois, R. N. (1997). Aspirin use and potential mechanisms for colorectal cancer prevention. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci119651

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.