Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulated formation of eicosanoids

Open access
Fitzpatrick, F.A., Soberman, Roy·2001·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Prostaglandins and their precursorsBetween 1965 and the mid-1980s, investigators laid a durable foundation for understanding the regulated formation and metabolic disposition of eicosanoids.First, they sought, and found in arachidonic acid, the biosynthetic precursor for the prostaglandins.Second, they identified phospholipids as the cellular compartment that harbored arachidonic acid, and they identified phospholipases as the enzymes essential for its liberation and for the ensuing biosynthesis of prostaglandins (1).Third, they deduced the existence of transient intermediates in the prostanoid biosynthetic pathway, leading to the eventual discovery of the prostaglandin endoperoxides, PGG 2 and PGH 2 (2, 3).Fourth, they established that the enzyme PGH synthase, or cyclooxygenase (COX), was a molecular target of great medical significance in reproductive, cardiovascular, and inflammatory disorders (4).Fifth, they established that rapid, comprehensive pulmonary metabolism limited the steady-state levels and duration of action of prostanoids, implying that they acted as autocoid lipid mediators, not hormones.Finally, they identified new prostanoids (5, 6) and their biosynthetic enzymes, as well as new lipoxygenase enzymatic pathways and their leukotriene products (7, 8), as medically significant molecules.Over this period, the most prominent themes in eicosanoid research were the identification of novel eicosanoid mediators, the determination of their molecular structures, and the establishment of their pharmacological activities.In a typical study of the time, investigators exposed tissues or cells to 50-100 µM of exogenous arachidonic acid, a concentration five-to tenfold greater than the K m for COX or lipoxygenases (K m ≈ 10 µM) (see Brash, this Perspective series, ref. 9).The contemporary model for eicosanoid biosynthesis, circa 1985, asserted that liberation of free arachidonic acid by phospholipase was the rate-limiting step in biosynthesis.Accordingly, providing saturating amounts of exogenous arachidonic acid ought to reveal all biosynthetic products and pathways.By 1985 or thereabouts, the quest for novel eicosanoid mediators of medical significance had reached the point of diminishing returns.Simultaneously, more and more investigators sought to understand the role of eicosanoid biosynthesis in disease processes.Accord-ingly, investigators shifted from exogenous arachidonic acid and Ca 2+ ionophore as preferred tools and embraced natural ligands, relevant to disease, to initiate receptor-coupled activation of eicosanoid formation.By the late 1980s, two lines of experimental inquiry began to provoke a reconsideration and refinement of the accepted model of eicosanoid biosynthesis.First, kinetic and quantitative aspects of eicosanoid biosynthesis initiated by growth factors or cytokines on mitotically competent cells suggested that it was an oversimplification to regard availability of arachidonic acid as the sole, rate-limiting step in cellular eicosanoid biosynthesis.Second, the discovery of the 5-lipoxygenase activating protein (FLAP) in 1990 proved unambiguously that some eicosanoids (leukotrienes) originated under conditions that were not rate-limited by arachidonic acid availability.The discovery of novel regulatory processes, particularly Ca 2++ -dependent redistribution of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) and the interaction between 5-LO and FLAP (10), offered a new framework on which to reconstruct the earlier model of eicosanoid biosynthesis.Here, we comment on several mechanisms through which cells attain more subtle control of eicosanoid biosynthesis than would be possible by simply limiting the availability of arachidonic acid.We first discuss the coordinated action of specific phospholipases, the enzymes that generate this substrate, with specific COXs and PGH isomerase enzymes.We then consider the restricted expression of eicosanoid biosynthetic enzymes and, finally, turn to the "suicide" inactivation of these biosynthetic enzymes, a general mechanism that may help terminate their proinflammatory function.In 1989 Lin et al. (11) provided an accurate glimpse of two regulatory processes that have assumed great importance during the past decade.First, they showed that PDGF, a typical growth factor, caused a sustained increase in PGE 2 biosynthesis by NIH 3T3 cells, commencing within 10 minutes and reaching a maximum after 2 hours.Second, they showed that cycloheximide inhibited more than 90% of the PGE 2 synthesis initiated by PDGF, suggesting that de novo protein syn- Functional coupling of phospholipases, COXs, and PGH isomerases

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci13241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Anggard, 1965, J Biol Chem, 240, 3518, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)97174-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lands, 1968, Biochim Biophys Acta, 164, 426, 10.1016/0005-2760(68)90168-9 · doi:10.1016/0005-2760(68)90168-9
  3. Hamberg, 1974, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 71, 3824, 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3824 · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.10.3824
  4. Nugteren, 1973, Biochim Biophys Acta, 326, 448, 10.1016/0005-2760(73)90145-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ferreira, 1971, Nat New Biol, 231, 237, 10.1038/newbio231237a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hamberg, 1975, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 72, 2994, 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2994 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Nugteren, 1975, Biochim Biophys Acta, 380, 299, 10.1016/0005-2760(75)90016-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Borgeat, 1976, J Biol Chem, 251, 7816, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)57008-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brash, 2001, J Clin Invest, 107, 1339, 10.1172/JCI13210 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dixon, 1990, Nature, 343, 282, 10.1038/343282a0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lin, 1989, J Biol Chem, 264, 17379, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71504-4 · DOI
  12. Kujubu, 1991, J Biol Chem, 266, 12866, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)98774-0 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Murakami, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 3103, 10.1074/jbc.274.5.3103 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Reddy, 1997, J Biol Chem, 272, 3231, 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3231 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chen, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 20301, 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20301 · DOI
  16. Clarke, 1991, N Engl J Med, 325, 1137, 10.1056/NEJM199110173251605 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Marcus, 1980, J Clin Invest, 66, 979, 10.1172/JCI109967 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Nowak, 1989, J Clin Invest, 83, 380, 10.1172/JCI113895 · DOI
  19. McGee, 1986, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 83, 1349, 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1349 · DOI
  20. Maclouf, 1988, J Biol Chem, 263, 174, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)57375-6 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)57375-6
  21. Feinmark, 1986, J Biol Chem, 261, 16466, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66589-5 · DOI
  22. Saxen, 1975, Int J Epidemiol, 4, 37, 10.1093/ije/4.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rocca, 1999, J Clin Invest, 103, 1469, 10.1172/JCI6400 · DOI
  24. Kutchera, 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93, 4816, 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4816 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Soslow, 2000, Cancer, 89, 2637, 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2637::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lim, 2000, Clin Cancer Res, 6, 519
  27. Chan, 1999, Cancer Res, 59, 991
  28. Tucker, 1999, Cancer Res, 59, 987
  29. Fujita, 1998, Cancer Res, 58, 4823
  30. Chulada, 2000, Cancer Res, 60, 4705
  31. Hwang, 1998, J Natl Cancer Inst, 90, 455, 10.1093/jnci/90.6.455 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Toyota, 2000, Cancer Res, 60, 4044
  33. Gao, 1997, Adv Exp Med Biol, 407, 41, 10.1007/978-1-4899-1813-0_7 · DOI
  34. Smith, 1972, Biochemistry, 11, 3276, 10.1021/bi00767a024 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Jones, 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 20166, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)30485-4 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)30485-4
  36. Wade, 1995, Arch Biochem Biophys, 321, 453, 10.1006/abbi.1995.1417 · DOI
  37. Orning, 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 14911, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)77203-7 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)77203-7
  38. Smith, 1970, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 41, 846, 10.1016/0006-291X(70)90160-9 · doi:10.1016/0006-291x(70)90160-9
  39. Lepley, 1994, J Biol Chem, 269, 2627, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)41990-9 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)41990-9

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Fitzpatrick, F. A., & Soberman, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
107
Issue
11
Pages
1347-1351
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007740082
Cited by
233
References
2
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulated formation of eicosanoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci13241
The paper
Fitzpatrick, F. A., & Soberman, R. (2001). Regulated formation of eicosanoids. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci13241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.