The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extensive tissue-regenerative capacity of neonatal human keratinocyte stem cells and their progeny
Open accessAbstract
Given our recent discovery that it is possible to separate human epidermal stem cells of the skin from their more committed progeny (i.e., transit-amplifying cells and early differentiating cells) using FACS techniques, we sought to determine the comparative tissue regeneration ability of these keratinocyte progenitors. We demonstrate that the ability to regenerate a fully stratified epidermis with appropriate spatial and temporal expression of differentiation markers in a short-term in vitro organotypic culture system is an intrinsic characteristic of both epidermal stem and transit-amplifying cells, although the stem cell fraction is most capable of achieving homeostasis. Early differentiating keratinocytes exhibited limited short-term tissue regeneration under specific experimental conditions in this assay, although significant improvement was obtained by manipulating microenvironmental factors, that is, coculture with minimally passaged dermal cells or exogenous supply of the ECM protein laminin-10/11. Importantly, transplantation of all classes of keratinocyte progenitors into an in vivo setting demonstrated that tissue regeneration can be elicited from stem, transit-amplifying, and early differentiating keratinocytes for up to 10 weeks. These data illustrate that significant proliferative and tissue-regenerative capacity resides not only in keratinocyte stem cells as expected, but also in their more committed progeny, including early differentiating cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T.-T., & Lavker, R. M. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90696-c · Cited by 2,276
Cited by
Blanpain, C., Lowry, W. E., Geoghegan, A., Polak, L., & Fuchs, E. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.012 · Cited by 1,428
Ito, M., Liu, Y., Yang, Z., Nguyen, J., Liang, F., Morris, R. J., & Cotsarelis, G. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1328 · Cited by 1,314
Cortisol synthesis in epidermis is induced by IL-1 and tissue injury
Vukelic, S., Stojadinovic, O., Pastar, I., Rabach, M., Krzyzanowska, A., Lebrun, E., Davis, S. C., Resnik, S., Brem, H., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.188268 · Cited by 193
MicroRNA-31 Promotes Skin Wound Healing by Enhancing Keratinocyte Proliferation and Migration
Li, D., Li, X. I., Wang, A., Meisgen, F., Pivarcsi, A., Sonkoly, E., Ståhle, M., & Landén, N. X. (2015) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2015.48 · Cited by 167
Laminins: Roles and Utility in Wound Repair
Iorio, V., Troughton, L. D., & Hamill, K. J. (2015) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0533 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, A., Pouliot, N., Redvers, R. P., & Kaur, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Publisher
- American Society for Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-400
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249221261
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extensive tissue-regenerative capacity of neonatal human keratinocyte stem cells and their progeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci19140
- The paper
- Li, A., Pouliot, N., Redvers, R. P., & Kaur, P. (2004). Extensive tissue-regenerative capacity of neonatal human keratinocyte stem cells and their progeny. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci19140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.