Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cortical spreading depression activates and upregulates MMP-9

Open access
Gursoy-Ozdemir, Yasemin, Qiu, Jianhua, Matsuoka, Norihiro, Bolay, Hayrunnisa, Bermpohl, Daniela, Jin, Hongwei, Wang, Xiaoying, Rosenberg, Gary A., Lo, Eng H., Moskowitz, Michael A.·2004·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Cortical spreading depression (CSD) is a propagating wave of neuronal and glial depolarization and has been implicated in disorders of neurovascular regulation such as stroke, head trauma, and migraine. In this study, we found that CSD alters blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability by activating brain MMPs. Beginning at 3-6 hours, MMP-9 levels increased within cortex ipsilateral to the CSD, reaching a maximum at 24 hours and persisting for at least 48 hours. Gelatinolytic activity was detected earliest within the matrix of cortical blood vessels and later within neurons and pia arachnoid (> or =3 hours), particularly within piriform cortex; this activity was suppressed by injection of the metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001 or in vitro by the addition of a zinc chelator (1,10-phenanthroline). At 3-24 hours, immunoreactive laminin, endothelial barrier antigen, and zona occludens-1 diminished in the ipsilateral cortex, suggesting that CSD altered proteins critical to the integrity of the BBB. At 3 hours after CSD, plasma protein leakage and brain edema developed contemporaneously. Albumin leakage was suppressed by the administration of GM6001. Protein leakage was not detected in MMP-9-null mice, implicating the MMP-9 isoform in barrier disruption. We conclude that intense neuronal and glial depolarization initiates a cascade that disrupts the BBB via an MMP-9-dependent mechanism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci200421227

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Otori, 2003, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 23, 43, 10.1097/00004647-200301000-00005 · doi:10.1097/00004647-200301000-00005
  2. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02360-X · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02360-x
  3. 10.1002/1097-4547(20000715)61:2<212::AID-JNR12>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02228-9 · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02228-9

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y., Qiu, J., Matsuoka, N., Bolay, H., Bermpohl, D., Jin, H., Wang, X., Rosenberg, G. A., Lo, E. H., & Moskowitz, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2004-05-15
Volume
113
Issue
10
Pages
1447-1455
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122779804
Cited by
512
References
57
FWCI
16.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical spreading depression activates and upregulates MMP-9. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci200421227
The paper
Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y., Qiu, J., Matsuoka, N., Bolay, H., Bermpohl, D., Jin, H., Wang, X., Rosenberg, G. A., Lo, E. H., & Moskowitz, M. A. (2004). Cortical spreading depression activates and upregulates MMP-9. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci200421227

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.