Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nephrin strands contribute to a porous slit diaphragm scaffold as revealed by electron tomography

Open access
Wartiovaara, Jorma, Öfverstedt, Lars-Göran, Khoshnoodi, Jamshid, Zhang, Jingjing, Mäkelä, Eetu, Sandin, Sara, Ruotsalainen, Vesa, Cheng, R. Holland, Jalanko, Hannu, Skoglund, Ulf, Tryggvason, Karl·2004·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Nephrin is a key functional component of the slit diaphragm, the structurally unresolved molecular filter in renal glomerular capillaries. Abnormal nephrin or its absence results in severe proteinuria and loss of the slit diaphragm. The diaphragm is a thin extracellular membrane spanning the approximately 40-nm-wide filtration slit between podocyte foot processes covering the capillary surface. Using electron tomography, we show that the slit diaphragm comprises a network of winding molecular strands with pores the same size as or smaller than albumin molecules, as demonstrated in humans, rats, and mice. In the network, which is occasionally stratified, immunogold-nephrin antibodies labeled individually detectable globular cross strands, about 35 nm in length, lining the lateral elongated pores. The cross strands, emanating from both sides of the slit, contacted at the slit center but had free distal endings. Shorter strands associated with the cross strands were observed at their base. Immunolabeling of recombinant nephrin molecules on transfected cells and in vitrified solution corroborated the findings in kidney. Nephrin-deficient proteinuric patients with Finnish-type congenital nephrosis and nephrin-knockout mice had only narrow filtration slits that lacked the slit diaphragm network and the 35-nm-long strands but contained shorter molecular structures. The results suggest the direct involvement of nephrin molecules in constituting the macromolecule-retaining slit diaphragm and its pores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci22562

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Wartiovaara, J., Öfverstedt, L.-G., Khoshnoodi, J., Zhang, J., Mäkelä, E., Sandin, S., Ruotsalainen, V., Cheng, R. H., Jalanko, H., Skoglund, U., & Tryggvason, K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2004-11-15
Volume
114
Issue
10
Pages
1475-1483
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097300515
Cited by
319
References
3
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nephrin strands contribute to a porous slit diaphragm scaffold as revealed by electron tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci22562
The paper
Wartiovaara, J., Öfverstedt, L.-G., Khoshnoodi, J., Zhang, J., Mäkelä, E., Sandin, S., Ruotsalainen, V., Cheng, R. H., Jalanko, H., Skoglund, U., & Tryggvason, K. (2004). Nephrin strands contribute to a porous slit diaphragm scaffold as revealed by electron tomography. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci22562

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.