Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thrombus formation in vivo

Open access
Furie, B.·2005·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

To examine thrombus formation in a living mouse, new technologies involving intravital videomicroscopy have been applied to the analysis of vascular windows to directly visualize arterioles and venules.After vessel wall injury in the microcirculation, thrombus development can be imaged in real time.These systems have been used to explore the role of platelets, blood coagulation proteins, endothelium, and the vessel wall during thrombus formation.The study of biochemistry and cell biology in a living animal offers new understanding of physiology and pathology in complex biologic systems. History of the study of hemostasis and thrombosisThe study of blood coagulation and thrombosis has moved through many stages.The classic studies of thrombus morphology and pathology were followed by a period in which blood coagulation proteins were identified based on the characterization of patients with hereditary clotting disorders.The fundamentals of platelet physiology, including platelet adhesion and aggregation, were defined by turbidimetric assay reporting platelet-platelet interaction and the adherence of platelets to glass beads, which reflects the ability of platelets to stick to surfaces that mimic the injured vessel wall.Only 40 years ago were the techniques of protein biochemistry applied to the study of hemostasis and thrombosis.Proteins were purified, their amino acid sequences determined, their genes isolated, and their interaction with other components analyzed in vitro.Protein domain structures were defined and their functional and structural relationship to other protein families determined.Site-specific mutagenesis and definition of the molecular basis of hemophilia identified functionally critical amino acids.From the analysis of the many enzymes, cofactors, structural proteins, ligands, and receptors involved in hemostasis and thrombosis, descriptive models emerged that explained the in vitro experimental results and the in vivo clinical observations in humans (1).These models have changed over the years, with continued refinement based on new information and fresh thinking (2-9).Still, many questions remain.We have learned what reactions and interactions can happen in vitro, but we need to understand what does happen in vivo.We are entering a new phase of discovery -the study of thrombosis in living animals to understand the mechanisms involved in this complex system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci26987

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Furie, B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
115
Issue
12
Pages
3355-3362
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083733554
Cited by
485
References
52
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombus formation in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci26987
The paper
Furie, B. (2005). Thrombus formation in vivo. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci26987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.