CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 210Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsEstrogen and related hormone effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The route of estrogen replacement therapy confers divergent effects on substrate oxidation and body composition in postmenopausal women.

Open access
O'Sullivan, A J, Crampton, L J, Freund, J, Ho, K K·1998·Journal of Clinical Investigation
DOI 10.1172/jci2773PMC PMC508969
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The route of estrogen replacement therapy has a major impact on the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis. Estrogen administration by the oral, but not the transdermal route, reduces IGF-I and increases GH levels in postmenopausal women. To investigate whether these perturbations have metabolic consequences, we compared the effects of 24 wk each of oral (Premarin 1.25 mg) and transdermal (Estraderm 100TTS) estrogen on energy metabolism and body composition in 18 postmenopausal women in an open-label randomized crossover study. Energy expenditure, lipid oxidation (lipid(ox)), and carbohydrate oxidation (CHOox) were measured by indirect calorimetry in the fasted and fed state before and after 2 and 6 mon treatment. Lean body mass, fat mass, and total body bone mineral density were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry before and after 6 mon treatment. Mean (+/-SE) Luteinizing hormone levels fell to comparable levels during oral and transdermal estrogen, and bone mineral density was significantly increased by both treatments. Mean IGF-I was significantly lower during oral estrogen (77+/-7 versus 97+/-7 microg/liter, P < 0.05) treatment. Lipid(ox) 30-60 min after a standardized meal was significantly lower (36+/-5 versus 54+/-5 mg/min, P < 0.01) and CHOox higher (147+/-13 versus 109+/-12 mg/min, P < 0.05) with oral compared with transdermal estrogen. Oral estrogen resulted in a 1.2+/-0.5 kg (P < 0.05) increase in fat mass and a 1.2+/-0.4 kg (P < 0.01) decrease in lean mass compared with transdermal estrogen. Lean body mass (0.4+/-0.2 kg) and fat mass (0. 1+/-0.4 kg) did not change significantly during transdermal estrogen. In summary, when compared with the transdermal route, oral estrogen reduces lipid(ox), increases fat mass, and reduces lean body mass. The route of estrogen therapy confers distinct and divergent effects on substrate oxidation and body composition. The suppression of lipidox during oral estrogen therapy may increase fat mass although the fall in IGF-I may lead to a loss of lean body mass. The route-dependent changes in body composition observed during estrogen replacement therapy may have important implications for postmenopausal health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci2773

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 210

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
O'Sullivan, A. J., Crampton, L. J., Freund, J., & Ho, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Ho, K K
ORCID
Ho, K K
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
102
Issue
5
Pages
1035-1040
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1172/jci2773
PMC
PMC508969
OpenAlex
W1974680721
Cited by
210
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
estrogen replacement therapy, route of administration, oral estrogen, transdermal estrogen, substrate oxidation, lipid oxidation, carbohydrate oxidation, energy expenditure, body composition, fat mass, lean body mass, bone mineral density, insulin-like growth factor I, growth hormone, postmenopausal women, energy metabolism, luteinizing hormone, conjugated equine estrogens, transdermal patch
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Administration, Oral, Body Composition, Body Weight, Calorimetry, Energy Metabolism, Estradiol, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Female, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Luteinizing Hormone, Growth Hormone, Bone Density, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review