Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era

Open access
DeLeo, Frank R., Chambers, Henry F.·2009·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of bacterial infections in developed countries and produces a wide spectrum of diseases, ranging from minor skin infections to fatal necrotizing pneumonia.Although S. aureus infections were historically treatable with common antibiotics, emergence of drug-resistant organisms is now a major concern.Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was endemic in hospitals by the late 1960s, but it appeared rapidly and unexpectedly in communities in the 1990s and is now prevalent worldwide.This Review focuses on progress made toward understanding the success of community-associated MRSA as a human pathogen, with an emphasis on genomewide approaches and virulence determinants.Recent emergence of CA-MRSA The molecular epidemiology and evolution of MRSA is a topic too expansive for this Review, but several key features of CA-MRSA strains merit mention.Based on molecular typing and microarray approaches, S. aureus can be grouped broadly into at least 10 major lineages, named clonal complexes (Table 1) (20-22).Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is commonly used to identify S. aureus isolates in the United States, and for simplicity, here we use this typing system to describe S. aureus strains (Sidebar 1) (23).In 2003, pulsedfield gel electrophoresis types USA100, USA200, USA500, USA600, and USA800 were the predominant health care-associated strains, whereas USA300 and USA400 were the most abundant CA-MRSA strains (23).MRSA strains can be characterized further by at least five distinct staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types (I-V), mobile genetic elements that encode methicillin resistance.Health care-associated MRSA strains historically contain predominantly SCCmecI-III, whereas CA-MRSA typically carries SCCmecIV (24,25).SCCmecIV, which is smaller than SCCmecI-III, lacks other antibiotic resistance elements and appears to impart little or no fitness cost to the organism (24).Consistent with this idea, CA-MRSA strains in general have faster growth rates than health care-associated MRSA strains (24).In addition to SCC-mecIV, CA-MRSA strains carry genes encoding a toxin known as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL, discussed below), and both are often used as markers for CA-MRSA. CA-MRSA in the clinicClinical epidemiology and disease.CA-MRSA infections appear to have emerged first among indigenous people of the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia in the early 1990s (18, 26).The first Conflict of interest:The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci38226

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
DeLeo, F. R., & Chambers, H. F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
119
Issue
9
Pages
2464-2474
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025841140
Cited by
512
References
16
FWCI
23.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci38226
The paper
DeLeo, F. R., & Chambers, H. F. (2009). Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci38226

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.