The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticle-based materials, such as drug delivery vehicles and diagnostic probes, currently under evaluation in oncology clinical trials are largely not tumor selective.To be clinically successful, the next generation of nanoparticle agents should be tumor selective, nontoxic, and exhibit favorable targeting and clearance profiles.Developing probes meeting these criteria is challenging, requiring comprehensive in vivo evaluations.Here, we describe our full characterization of an approximately 7-nm diameter multimodal silica nanoparticle, exhibiting what we believe to be a unique combination of structural, optical, and biological properties.This ultrasmall cancer-selective silica particle was recently approved for a first-in-human clinical trial.Optimized for efficient renal clearance, it concurrently achieved specific tumor targeting.Dye-encapsulating particles, surface functionalized with cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide ligands and radioiodine, exhibited high-affinity/avidity binding, favorable tumor-to-blood residence time ratios, and enhanced tumor-selective accumulation in α v β 3 integrin-expressing melanoma xenografts in mice.Further, the sensitive, real-time detection and imaging of lymphatic drainage patterns, particle clearance rates, nodal metastases, and differential tumor burden in a large-animal model of melanoma highlighted the distinct potential advantage of this multimodal platform for staging metastatic disease in the clinical setting.and comprehensively defined according to the following set of diagnostic criteria: favorable distribution and targeting kinetics (1, 5-9), efficient renal clearance (10, 11), extended circulation (blood residence) times (5, 12, 13), pronounced tissue signal amplification (5, 6, 14), and improved tumoral penetration (15).Recently reported design criteria have been proposed for advancing targeted probes to the clinic (11).These have largely been restricted to improving renal clearance properties of inorganic particles containing inherently toxic components.The relative lack of in vivo toxicology data associated with these probes has led to persistent and valid safety concerns ( 16), prompting a number of particle-design modifications (9, 17-19), including size, composition, and surface chemistry, that promote more rapid clearance through kidney (renal) or liver (hepatic) pathways (20).While such approaches may minimize toxicity, the ultimate fate and impact of residual particles in the reticuloendothelial system (RES; liver, spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow) remains unclear, particularly if toxicity is related to prolonged organ residence times (16, 17).Accelerated particle clearance may also preclude certain clinical applications as a result of restrictions imposed upon the available imaging period.Further, while rapid particle extravasation may facilitate clearance and delivery to tumors, reduced receptor binding (5) and increased nonspecific tissue dispersal (21, 22) may also occur, increasing image background and, potentially, toxicity by prolonging retention.Only a relatively small percentage of new imaging agents undergoing comprehensive preclinical testing potentially satisfy diagnostic criteria for translation (2).Although a number of fluo-Authorship note: Miriam Benezra and Oula Penate-Medina contributed equally to this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Liu, F., Nasr, K., Misra, P., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.314 · Cited by 754
Cited by
Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications
Wicki, A., Witzigmann, D., Balasubramanian, V., & Huwyler, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030 · Cited by 1,901
Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology
Schroeder, A., Heller, D. A., Winslow, M. M., Dahlman, J. E., Pratt, G. W., Langer, R., Jacks, T., & Anderson, D. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3180 · Cited by 1,159
Nanomaterials for In Vivo Imaging
Smith, B. R., & Gambhir, S. S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00073 · Cited by 1,075
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in medicine—Recent advances
Mamaeva, V., Sahlgren, C., & Lindén, M. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.018 · Cited by 707
Transport and interactions of nanoparticles in the kidneys
Du, B., Yu, M., & Zheng, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0038-3 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Benezra, M., Penate-Medina, O., Zanzonico, P. B., Schaer, D., Ow, H., Burns, A., DeStanchina, E., Longo, V., Herz, E., Iyer, S., Wolchok, J., Larson, S. M., Wiesner, U., & Bradbury, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2768-2780
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063443915
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci45600
- The paper
- Benezra, M., Penate-Medina, O., Zanzonico, P. B., Schaer, D., Ow, H., Burns, A., DeStanchina, E., Longo, V., Herz, E., Iyer, S., Wolchok, J., Larson, S. M., Wiesner, U., & Bradbury, M. S. (2011). Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci45600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.