The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell progenitor cells promote liver regeneration in rats
Open accessAbstract
The ability of the liver to regenerate is crucial to protect liver function after injury and during chronic disease. Increases in hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are thought to drive liver regeneration. However, in contrast to endothelial progenitor cells, mature LSECs express little HGF. Therefore, we sought to establish in rats whether liver injury causes BM LSEC progenitor cells to engraft in the liver and provide increased levels of HGF and to examine the relative contribution of resident and BM LSEC progenitors. LSEC label-retaining cells and progenitors were identified in liver and LSEC progenitors in BM. BM LSEC progenitors did not contribute to normal LSEC turnover in the liver. However, after partial hepatectomy, BM LSEC progenitor proliferation and mobilization to the circulation doubled. In the liver, one-quarter of the LSECs were BM derived, and BM LSEC progenitors differentiated into fenestrated LSECs. When irradiated rats underwent partial hepatectomy, liver regeneration was compromised, but infusion of LSEC progenitors rescued the defect. Further analysis revealed that BM LSEC progenitors expressed substantially more HGF and were more proliferative than resident LSEC progenitors after partial hepatectomy. Resident LSEC progenitors within their niche may play a smaller role in recovery from partial hepatectomy than BM LSEC progenitors, but, when infused after injury, these progenitors engrafted and expanded markedly over a 2-month period. In conclusion, LSEC progenitor cells are present in liver and BM, and recruitment of BM LSEC progenitors is necessary for normal liver regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slowly cycling (label‐retaining) epidermal cells behave like clonogenic stem cells in vitro
Morris, R. J., & Potten, C. S. (1994) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2184.1994.tb01425.x · Cited by 207
Cited by
Godoy, P., Hewitt, N. J., Albrecht, U., Andersen, M. E., Ansari, N., Bhattacharya, S., Bode, J. G., Bolleyn, J., Borner, C., Böttger, J., et al. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5 · Cited by 1,280
Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells: Physiology and role in liver diseases
Poisson, J., Lemoinne, S., Boulanger, C., Durand, F., Moreau, R., Valla, D., & Rautou, P.-E. (2017) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.009 · Cited by 1,047
Liver regeneration: biological and pathological mechanisms and implications
Michalopoulos, G. K., & Bhushan, B. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0342-4 · Cited by 998
Divergent angiocrine signals from vascular niche balance liver regeneration and fibrosis
Ding, B.-S., Cao, Z., Lis, R., Nolan, D. J., Guo, P., Simons, M., Penfold, M. E., Shido, K., Rabbany, S. Y., & Rafii, S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12681 · Cited by 626
Preparing the ground for tissue regeneration: from mechanism to therapy
Forbes, S. J., & Rosenthal, N. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3653 · Cited by 585
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Wang, X., Xie, G., Wang, L., Hill, C. K., & DeLeve, L. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2012-04-02
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1567-1573
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975184180
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell progenitor cells promote liver regeneration in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci58789
- The paper
- Wang, L., Wang, X., Xie, G., Wang, L., Hill, C. K., & DeLeve, L. D. (2012). Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell progenitor cells promote liver regeneration in rats. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci58789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.