Cited by 207Hair Growth and DisordersSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Slowly cycling (label‐retaining) epidermal cells behave like clonogenic stem cells in vitro

Morris, R. J., Potten, C. S.·1994·Cell Proliferation

Abstract

Abstract. Slowly cycling label‐retaining epidermal cells were identified by light microscopic autoradiography in the dorsal epidermis and hair follicles of adult mice 8–10 weeks after twice daily injection of [3 H]dT on days three through five after birth. Pulse‐labelled epidermal cells were identified in the epidermis and hair follicles of 7–8 week old mice 1 h after a single injection of [3 H]dT at 8.00 a.m. For mice of both groups, epidermal cells including those from the hair follicles were harvested by trypsinization and were cultured from low density on feeder layers of irradiated Swiss mouse 3T3. On days 2, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 12, the cultures were fixed and processed for light microscopic autoradiography, and the distribution of labelled nuclei was quantified. On day 2 of culture, both label‐retaining cells (LRC) and pulse labelled cells (PLC) were found primarily as single cells. After five days, LRC were found as pairs and clusters having silver grain counts consistent with their division. In contrast, PLC remained primarily as single cells. These results suggest that LRC may divide to form colonies (are clonogenic) whereas PLC are rarely clonogenic. The significance of this experiment is that it suggests that the LRC may not only be persistent in the epidermis, but that they may also be cells with relatively greater proliferative potential than the PLC and are thus likely to be stem cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1994.tb01425.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, R. J., & Potten, C. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Morris, R. J.
Venue
Cell Proliferation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
279-289
ISSN
  • 0960-7722 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2184
OpenAlex
W2036949285
Cited by
207
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Proliferation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-45293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
label-retaining cells, epidermal stem cells, epidermal proliferation, clonogenicity, hair follicle, cell cycling, skin regeneration, cell colony formation
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Aging, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Autoradiography, Cell Cycle, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Female, Mice, Inbred Strains, Stem Cells, Time Factors, Keratinocytes, Hair Follicle, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review