Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A lymphatic defect causes ocular hypertension and glaucoma in mice

Open access
Thomson, Benjamin R., Heinen, Stefan, Jeansson, Marie, Ghosh, Asish K., Fatima, Anees, Sung, Hoon-Ki, Onay, Tuncer, Chen, Hui, Yamaguchi, Shinji, Economides, Aris N., Flenniken, Ann, Gale, Nicholas W., Hong, Young-Kwon, Fawzi, Amani, Liu, Xiaorong, Kume, Tsutomu, Quaggin, Susan E.·2014·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness, afflicting more than 60 million people worldwide. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) due to impaired aqueous humor drainage is a major risk factor for the development of glaucoma. Here, we demonstrated that genetic disruption of the angiopoietin/TIE2 (ANGPT/TIE2) signaling pathway results in high IOP, buphthalmos, and classic features of glaucoma, including retinal ganglion degeneration and vision loss. Eyes from mice with induced deletion of Angpt1 and Angpt2 (A1A2Flox(WB) mice) lacked drainage pathways in the corneal limbus, including Schlemm's canal and lymphatic capillaries, which share expression of the PROX1, VEGFR3, and FOXC family of transcription factors. VEGFR3 and FOXCs have been linked to lymphatic disorders in patients, and FOXC1 has been linked to glaucoma. In contrast to blood endothelium, in which ANGPT2 is an antagonist of ANGPT1, we have shown that both ligands cooperate to regulate TIE2 in the lymphatic network of the eye. While A1A2Flox(WB) mice developed high IOP and glaucoma, expression of ANGPT1 or ANGPT2 alone was sufficient for ocular drainage. Furthermore, we demonstrated that loss of FOXC2 from lymphatics results in TIE2 downregulation, suggesting a mechanism for ocular defects in patients with FOXC mutations. These data reveal a pathogenetic and molecular basis for glaucoma and demonstrate the importance of angiopoietin ligand cooperation in the lymphatic endothelium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci77162

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Thomson, B. R., Heinen, S., Jeansson, M., Ghosh, A. K., Fatima, A., Sung, H.-K., Onay, T., Chen, H., Yamaguchi, S., Economides, A. N., Flenniken, A., Gale, N. W., Hong, Y.-K., Fawzi, A., Liu, X., Kume, T., & Quaggin, S. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2014-09-09
Volume
124
Issue
10
Pages
4320-4324
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062143592
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A lymphatic defect causes ocular hypertension and glaucoma in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci77162
The paper
Thomson, B. R., Heinen, S., Jeansson, M., Ghosh, A. K., Fatima, A., Sung, H.-K., Onay, T., Chen, H., Yamaguchi, S., Economides, A. N., Flenniken, A., Gale, N. W., Hong, Y.-K., Fawzi, A., Liu, X., Kume, T., & Quaggin, S. E. (2014). A lymphatic defect causes ocular hypertension and glaucoma in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci77162

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.