Anti-thymocyte globulin/G-CSF treatment preserves β cell function in patients with established type 1 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous efforts to preserve β cell function in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have focused largely on the use of single immunomodulatory agents administered within 100 days of diagnosis. Based on human and preclinical studies, we hypothesized that a combination of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and pegylated granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) would preserve β cell function in patients with established T1D (duration of T1D >4 months and <2 years). METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was performed on 25 subjects: 17 subjects received ATG (2.5 mg/kg intravenously) followed by pegylated G-CSF (6 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 6 doses) and 8 subjects received placebo. The primary outcome was the 1-year change in AUC C-peptide following a 2-hour mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT). At baseline, the age (mean ± SD) was 24.6 ± 10 years; mean BMI was 25.4 ± 5.2 kg/m²; mean A1c was 6.5% ± 1.1%; insulin use was 0.31 ± 0.22 units/kg/d; and length of diagnosis was 1 ± 0.5 years. RESULTS: Combination ATG/G-CSF treatment tended to preserve β cell function in patients with established T1D. The mean difference in MMTT-stimulated AUC C-peptide between treated and placebo subjects was 0.28 nmol/l/min (95% CI 0.001-0.552, P = 0.050). A1c was lower in ATG/G-CSF-treated subjects at the 6-month study visit. ATG/G-CSF therapy was associated with relative preservation of Tregs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with established T1D may benefit from combination immunotherapy approaches to preserve β cell function. Further studies are needed to determine whether such approaches may prevent or delay the onset of the disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01106157. FUNDING: The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and Sanofi.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pilot studies found early and lasting benefit from low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
“low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has shown early and sustained efficacy in pilot studies153,154”
From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [154]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 167
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Haller M, et al. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) fails to preserve β-cell function in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). Diabetes. 2014;63:A428.
- Authors
- Haller, M. J., Gitelman, S. E., Gottlieb, P. A., Michels, A. W., Rosenthal, S. M., Shuster, J. J., Zou, B., Brusko, T. M., Hulme, M. A., Wasserfall, C. H., Mathews, C. E., Atkinson, M. A., & Schatz, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida Health (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2014-12-15
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 448-455
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4382237
- OpenAlex
- W2055299834
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (09PG-T1D022)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001427, 2-2012-280, UL1TR000064, UL1TR001082, UL1TR000004, AI-42288)
- University of California, San Francisco (UL1-TR000004)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01 AI42288, P01AI042288)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK063720)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, antithymocyte globulin, beta-cell preservation, immunomodulatory therapy, C-peptide, regulatory T cells, mixed meal tolerance test
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Antilymphocyte Serum, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Combinations, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Polyethylene Glycols, Single-Blind Method, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Treatment Outcome, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review