Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 897

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transplanted cord blood–derived endothelial precursor cells augment postnatal neovascularization

Open access
Murohara, Toyoaki, Ikeda, Hisao, Duan, Junli, Shintani, Satoshi, Sasaki, Ken-ichiro, Eguchi, Hiroyuki, Onitsuka, Ichiro, Matsui, Kazuo, Imaizumi, Tsutomu·2000·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) have been identified in adult peripheral blood. We examined whether EPCs could be isolated from umbilical cord blood, a rich source for hematopoietic progenitors, and whether in vivo transplantation of EPCs could modulate postnatal neovascularization. Numerous cell clusters, spindle-shaped and attaching (AT) cells, and cord-like structures developed from culture of cord blood mononuclear cells (MNCs). Fluorescence-trace experiments revealed that cell clusters, AT cells, and cord-like structures predominantly were derived from CD34-positive MNCs (MNC(CD34+)). AT cells and cell clusters could be generated more efficiently from cord blood MNCs than from adult peripheral blood MNCs. AT cells incorporated acetylated-LDL, released nitric oxide, and expressed KDR, VE-cadherin, CD31, and von Willebrand factor but not CD45. Locally transplanted AT cells survived and participated in capillary networks in the ischemic tissues of immunodeficient nude rats in vivo. AT cells thus had multiple endothelial phenotypes and were defined as a major population of EPCs. Furthermore, laser Doppler and immunohistochemical analyses revealed that EPC transplantation quantitatively augmented neovascularization and blood flow in the ischemic hindlimb. In conclusion, umbilical cord blood is a valuable source of EPCs, and transplantation of cord blood-derived EPCs represents a promising strategy for modulating postnatal neovascularization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci8296

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 897

Metadata

Authors
Murohara, T., Ikeda, H., Duan, J., Shintani, S., Sasaki, K.-I., Eguchi, H., Onitsuka, I., Matsui, K., & Imaizumi, T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
105
Issue
11
Pages
1527-1536
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034916016
Cited by
897
References
5
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transplanted cord blood–derived endothelial precursor cells augment postnatal neovascularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci8296
The paper
Murohara, T., Ikeda, H., Duan, J., Shintani, S., Sasaki, K.-I., Eguchi, H., Onitsuka, I., Matsui, K., & Imaizumi, T. (2000). Transplanted cord blood–derived endothelial precursor cells augment postnatal neovascularization. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci8296

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.