Cited by 241Epilepsy research and treatmentTuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Second-hit mosaic mutation in mTORC1 repressor DEPDC5 causes focal cortical dysplasia–associated epilepsy

Open access
Ribierre, Théo, Deleuze, Charlotte, Bacq, Alexandre, Baldassari, Sara, Marsan, Elise, Chipaux, Mathilde, Muraca, Giuseppe, Roussel, Delphine +4 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

DEP domain-containing 5 protein (DEPDC5) is a repressor of the recently recognized amino acid-sensing branch of the mTORC1 pathway. So far, its function in the brain remains largely unknown. Germline loss-of-function mutations in DEPDC5 have emerged as a major cause of familial refractory focal epilepsies, with case reports of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Remarkably, a fraction of patients also develop focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), a neurodevelopmental cortical malformation. We therefore hypothesized that a somatic second-hit mutation arising during brain development may support the focal nature of the dysplasia. Here, using postoperative human tissue, we provide the proof of concept that a biallelic 2-hit - brain somatic and germline - mutational mechanism in DEPDC5 causes focal epilepsy with FCD. We discovered a mutation gradient with a higher rate of mosaicism in the seizure-onset zone than in the surrounding epileptogenic zone. Furthermore, we demonstrate the causality of a Depdc5 brain mosaic inactivation using CRISPR-Cas9 editing and in utero electroporation in a mouse model recapitulating focal epilepsy with FCD and SUDEP-like events. We further unveil a key role of Depdc5 in shaping dendrite and spine morphology of excitatory neurons. This study reveals promising therapeutic avenues for treating drug-resistant focal epilepsies with mTORC1-targeting molecules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci99384

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some individuals, a second genetic hit with a combination of both somatic and germline mutations in the same gene or genes in related pathways (eg mTOR pathway) is identified.

    “In some individuals, a second genetic hit with a combination of both somatic and germline mutations in the same gene or genes in related pathways (eg.mTOR pathway) is identified 124 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Results and Discussion report a child with an inherited DEPDC5 variant and a second, somatic DEPDC5 variant in brain tissue, supporting a two-hit mechanism in the same mTORC1-pathway gene. The paper does not establish a two-hit combination across different genes in related pathways. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MCD, including FCD, may be associated with a pathogenic germline or somatic variant, which may show a mutation gradient in resected brain tissue.

    “MCD, including FCD, may be associated with a pathogenic germline or somatic variant, which may show a mutation gradient in resected brain tissue.”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [124]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goldman AM, Buchanan G, Aiba I, Noebels JL. SUDEP animal Models. In: Pitkänen A, Buck- master P, Galanopoulou A, Moshé S, eds. Models of Seizures and Epilepsy (Second edition). Amster- dam, Netherlands:Elsevier;2017:1007-1018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ribierre, T., Deleuze, C., Bacq, A., Baldassari, S., Marsan, E., Chipaux, M., Muraca, G., Roussel, D., Navarro, V., Leguern, E., Miles, R., & Baulac, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Fondation de Rothschild (FR)
Corresponding author
Baulac, Stéphanie
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2018-04-30
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
2452-2458
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2802211669
Cited by
241
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (No 322721, No 682345)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
DEPDC5, mTORC1, focal cortical dysplasia, focal epilepsy, second-hit mutations, somatic mosaicism, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, amino acid sensing, seizure onset zone, excitatory neurons, drug-resistant epilepsy
MeSH terms
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Animals, Dendrites, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Mutant Strains, Neurons, Repressor Proteins, Spine, Germ-Line Mutation, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Mice, Malformations of Cortical Development, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review