Analytic Studies of Cloud Droplet Coalescence I
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kumar and Ramkrishna [292] technique applied to binary and multiple breakages, aggregation with constant, sum, and product kernels, and simultaneous breakage and aggregation; comparison between analytical and numerical results shows good agreement.
“The technique has been applied to binary and multiple breakages with power-law breakage rates, aggregation with constant, sum, and product kernel, and simultaneous breakage and aggregation. Comparison between analytical [293-295] and numerical results show good agreement.”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [294]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Scott, W. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Published
- 1968
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
