The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Moisture Drought in China, 1950–2006
Open accessAbstract
Four physically based land surface hydrology models driven by a common observation-based 3-hourly meteorological dataset were used to simulate soil moisture over China for the period 1950–2006. Monthly values of total column soil moisture from the simulations were converted to percentiles and an ensemble method was applied to combine all model simulations into a multimodel ensemble from which agricultural drought severities and durations were estimated. A cluster analysis method and severity–area–duration (SAD) algorithm were applied to the soil moisture data to characterize drought spatial and temporal variability. For drought areas greater than 150 000 km2 and durations longer than 3 months, a total of 76 droughts were identified during the 1950–2006 period. The duration of 50 of these droughts was less than 6 months. The five most prominent droughts, in terms of spatial extent and then duration, were identified. Of these, the drought of 1997–2003 was the most severe, accounting for the majority of the severity–area–duration envelope of events with areas smaller than 5 million km2. The 1997–2003 drought was also pervasive in terms of both severity and spatial extent. It was also found that soil moisture in north central and northeastern China had significant downward trends, whereas most of Xinjiang, the Tibetan Plateau, and small areas of Yunnan province had significant upward trends. Regions with downward trends were larger than those with upward trends (37% versus 26% of the land area), implying that over the period of analysis, the country has become slightly drier in terms of soil moisture. Trends in drought severity, duration, and frequency suggest that soil moisture droughts have become more severe, prolonged, and frequent during the past 57 yr, especially for northeastern and central China, suggesting an increasing susceptibility to agricultural drought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ge, Q.-S., Zheng, J.-Y., Hao, Z.-X., Zhang, P.-Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2005) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-86-5-671 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China
Jia, X., Shao, M., Zhu, Y., & Luo, Y. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.011 · Cited by 759
Anthropogenic shift towards higher risk of flash drought over China
Yuan, X., Wang, L., Wu, P., Ji, P., Sheffield, J., & Zhang, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12692-7 · Cited by 486
Self-citationIncrease in severe and extreme soil moisture droughts for Europe under climate change
Grillakis, M. G. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.001 · Cited by 404
Hamman, J. J., Nijssen, B., Bohn, T. J., Gergel, D. R., & Mao, Y. (2018) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-3481-2018 · Cited by 322
A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: the eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset
Schellekens, J., Dutra, E., Martínez-de la Torre, A., Balsamo, G., van Dijk, A., Sperna Weiland, F., Minvielle, M., Calvet, J.-C., Decharme, B., Eisner, S., et al. (2017) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-9-389-2017 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, A., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Sheffield, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3257-3271
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2168663102
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.