CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 155Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Arrest of Inverse Energy Cascade and the Rhines Scale

Sukoriansky, Semion, Dikovskaya, Nadejda, Galperin, Boris·2007·Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
DOI 10.1175/jas4013.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The notion of the cascade arrest in a β-plane turbulence in the context of continuously forced flows is revised in this paper using both theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. It is demonstrated that the upscale energy propagation cannot be stopped by a β effect and can only be absorbed by friction. A fundamental dimensional parameter in flows with a β effect, the Rhines scale, LR, has traditionally been associated with the cascade arrest or with the scale that separates turbulence and Rossby wave–dominated spectral ranges. It is shown that rather than being a measure of the inverse cascade arrest, LR is a characteristic of different processes in different flow regimes. In unsteady flows, LR can be identified with the moving energy front propagating toward the decreasing wavenumbers. When large-scale energy sink is present, β-plane turbulence may attain several steady-state regimes. Two of these regimes are highlighted: friction-dominated and zonostrophic. In the former, LR does not have any particular significance, while in the latter, the Rhines scale nearly coincides with the characteristic length associated with the large-scale friction. Spectral analysis in the frequency domain demonstrates that Rossby waves coexist with turbulence on scales smaller than LR thus indicating that the Rhines scale cannot be viewed as a crossover between turbulence and Rossby wave ranges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jas4013.1

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boer, 1983, Large-scale two-dimensional turbulence in the atmosphere., J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 164, 10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0164:LSTDTI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  2. Nof, 2004, A different outflow length scale?, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 793, 10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0793:ADOLS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 155

Related

Metadata

Authors
Sukoriansky, S., Dikovskaya, N., & Galperin, B.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
64
Issue
9
Pages
3312-3327
ISSN
  • 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0469
DOI
10.1175/jas4013.1
OpenAlex
W2073636625
Cited by
155
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
inverse energy cascade, Rhines scale, Rossby waves, spectral analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review