Cited by 1,177Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane

Rhines, Peter B.·1975·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Two-dimensional eddies in a homogeneous fluid at large Reynolds number, if closely packed, are known to evolve towards larger scales. In the presence of a restoring force, the geophysical beta-effect, this cascade produces a field of waves without loss of energy, and the turbulent migration of the dominant scale nearly ceases at a wavenumber k β = (β/2 U ) ½ independent of the initial conditions other than U , the r.m.s. particle speed, and β, the northward gradient of the Coriolis frequency. The conversion of turbulence into waves yields, in addition, more narrowly peaked wavenumber spectra and less fine-structure in the spatial maps, while smoothly distributing the energy about physical space. The theory is discussed, using known integral constraints and similarity solutions, model equations, weak-interaction wave theory (which provides the terminus for the cascade) and other linearized instability theory. Computer experiments with both finite-difference and spectral codes are reported. The central quantity is the cascade rate, defined as \[ T = 2\int_0^{\infty} kF(k)dk/U^3\langle k\rangle , \] where F is the nonlinear transfer spectrum and 〈 k 〉 the mean wavenumber of the energy spectrum. (In unforced inviscid flow T is simply U −1 d 〈 k 〉 −1 / dt , or the rate at which the dominant scale expands in time t .) T is shown to have a mean value of 3·0 × 10 −2 for pure two-dimensional turbulence, but this decreases by a factor of five at the transition to wave motion. We infer from weak-interaction theory even smaller values for k [Lt ] k β . After passing through a state of propagating waves, the homogeneous cascade tends towards a flow of alternating zonal jets which, we suggest, are almost perfectly steady. When the energy is intermittent in space, however, model equations show that the cascade is halted simply by the spreading of energy about space, and then the end state of a zonal flow is probably not achieved. The geophysical application is that the cascade of pure turbulence to large scales is defeated by wave propagation, helping to explain why the energy-containing eddies in the ocean and atmosphere, though significantly nonlinear, fail to reach the size of their respective domains, and are much smaller. For typical ocean flows, $k_{\beta}^{-1} = 70\,{\rm km} $ , while for the atmosphere, $k_{\beta}^{-1} = 1000\,{\rm km}$ . In addition the cascade generates, by itself, zonal flow (or more generally, flow along geostrophic contours).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112075001504

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on the Rhines scale LR ∼ (uRMS/β)1/2, an increase of the jets width during the transition is expected, since the RMS eddy velocity increases.

    “Based on the Rhines scale L R ∼ ( u RMS /β ) 1 / 2 (Rhines 1975), where we recall that u RMS takes into account all the components of the flow (equation (3.1)), we do expect an increase of the jets width during the transition, since the RMS eddy velocity increases.”
  • The Rhines scale has often been associated with the width of zonal jets.

    “Originally defined in Rhines (1975), it has often been associated with the width of zonal jets.”
  • The Rhines scale L_R is the scale at which the inertial term equates the β term; below it the advective term dominates and above it the β-term is dominant.

    “Under this scale, the advective term dominates and above it the β -term is dominant.”
  • The latitudinal difference in jet and vortex structure is likely driven by the topographical beta effect, which is stronger near the equator and promotes axisymmetric jets, while at higher latitudes the beta effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where giant vortices are favored.

    “This is likely driven by the topographical β effect, due to the spherical shell geometry, which is stronger near the equator, promoting strong axisymmetric jets, while, at higher latitudes, the β -effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where the formation of giant vortices is favored”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhines, P. B.
Affiliations
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Rhines, Peter B.
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
1975-06-10
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
417-443
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2099743374
Cited by
1,177
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 28
FWCI
26.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
beta-plane, two-dimensional turbulence, energy cascade, wave propagation, zonal jets, energy-containing eddies, integral constraints, self-similar solutions, model equations, weakly nonlinear waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review