Cited by 36Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Extratropical Forcing of Tropical Atlantic Variability during Boreal Summer and Fall

Smirnov, Dimitry, Vimont, Daniel J.·2012·Journal of Climate

Abstract

The connection between midlatitude Atlantic sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and tropical SST variations during boreal summer and fall are investigated using a coupled general circulation model (GCM). This research follows on an observational study that finds that, using linear inverse modeling (LIM), predictions of boreal summer tropical Atlantic Meridional Mode (AMM) variations can be made with skill exceeding persistence with lead times of about one year. The LIM framework identified extratropical Atlantic SST anomalies as important precursors to the AMM variations. The authors have corroborated this finding using a general circulation model coupled to a slab ocean, which represents a completely different physical basis from the LIM. Initializing the GCM with the LIM-derived “optimal” SST anomaly in November results in a steady equatorward propagation of SST anomalies into the subtropics during the following boreal spring. Thereafter, the GCM suggests that two possible feedbacks propagate the SST anomalies farther equatorward and westward with minimal loss of amplitude: the dominant wind–evaporation–SST (WES) thermodynamic feedback and a secondary low-cloud–SST radiative feedback. This study shows that this result has strong seasonal dependence and consists of nonlinear interactions when considering warm and cold “optimal” conditions separately. One main finding is that oceanic dynamics are not essential to understanding extratropical–tropical interaction in the Atl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00104.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the following boreal fall (SON) the most significant SST anomalies in the tropical Atlantic for canonical El Niño relative to Modoki continue to shift southwestward (15 N-30 N, 45 W-75 W), possibly due to a positive wind-evaporation-SST feedback.

    “During the following boreal fall (SON) the most significant SST anomalies in the tropical Atlantic for canonical El Niño relative to Modoki continue to shift southwestward ($15 N-30 N, 45 W-75 W), possibly due to a positive wind-evaporation-SST feedback (Figure 5d) [Smirnov and Vimont, 2012].”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Smirnov and Vimont, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smirnov, D., & Vimont, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2012-03-14
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
2056-2076
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2049799524
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
tropical-extratropical interaction, Atlantic Meridional Mode, linear inverse modeling, wind-evaporation-SST feedback, seasonal dependence, Atlantic basin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review