The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multidiagnostic Intercomparison of Tropical-Width Time Series Using Reanalyses and Satellite Observations
Abstract
Poleward migration of the latitudinal edge of the tropics of 0.25°–3.0° decade−1 has been reported in several recent studies based on satellite and radiosonde data and reanalysis output covering the past ~30 yr. The goal of this paper is to identify the extent to which this large range of trends can be explained by the use of different data sources, time periods, and edge definitions, as well as how the widening varies as a function of hemisphere and season. Toward this end, a suite of tropical edge latitude diagnostics based on tropopause height, winds, precipitation–evaporation, and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) are analyzed using several reanalyses and satellite datasets. These diagnostics include both previously used definitions and new definitions designed for more robust detection. The wide range of widening trends is shown to be primarily due to the use of different datasets and edge definitions and only secondarily due to varying start–end dates. This study also shows that the large trends (>~1° decade−1) previously reported in tropopause and OLR diagnostics are due to the use of subjective definitions based on absolute thresholds. Statistically significant Hadley cell expansion based on the mean meridional streamfunction of 1.0°–1.5° decade−1 is found in three of four reanalyses that cover the full time period (1979–2009), whereas other diagnostics yield trends of −0.5°–0.8° decade−1 that are mostly insignificant. There are indications of hemispheric and seasonal differences in the trends, but the differences are not statistically significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming
Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., & Reichler, T. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl028443 · Cited by 1,219
Cited by
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1205276109 · Cited by 1,435
Hansen, J., Kharecha, P., Sato, M., Masson-Delmotte, V., Ackerman, F., Beerling, D. J., Hearty, P. J., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hsu, S.-L., Parmesan, C., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081648 · Cited by 674
The expanding tropics: a critical assessment of the observational and modeling studies
Lucas, C., Timbal, B., & Nguyen, H. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.251 · Cited by 258
Son, S.-W., Han, B.-R., Garfinkel, C. I., Kim, S.-Y., Park, R., Abraham, N. L., Akiyoshi, H., Archibald, A. T., Butchart, N., Chipperfield, M. P., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf21 · Cited by 58
Southward shift of the northern tropical belt from 1945 to 1980
Brönnimann, S., Fischer, A. M., Rozanov, E., Poli, P., Compo, G. P., & Sardeshmukh, P. D. (2015) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2568 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, S. M., & Rosenlof, K. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2012-02-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1061-1078
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2157833028
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multidiagnostic Intercomparison of Tropical-Width Time Series Using Reanalyses and Satellite Observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00127.1
- The paper
- Davis, S. M., & Rosenlof, K. H. (2012). A Multidiagnostic Intercomparison of Tropical-Width Time Series Using Reanalyses and Satellite Observations. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00127.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.