Cited by 170Hydrology and Drought AnalysisClimate variability and modelsClimate change impacts on agriculture

Attribution analysis of the Ethiopian drought of 2015

Philip, Sjoukje, Kew, Sarah F., Jan van Oldenborgh, Geert, Otto, Friederike, O’Keefe, Sarah, Haustein, Karsten, King, Andrew, Zegeye, Abiy +6 more·2018·Journal of Climate

Abstract

In northern and central Ethiopia, 2015 was a very dry year. Rainfall was only from one-half to three-quarters of the usual amount, with both the “belg” (February–May) and “kiremt” rains (June–September) affected. The timing of the rains that did fall was also erratic. Many crops failed, causing food shortages for many millions of people. The role of climate change in the probability of a drought like this is investigated, focusing on the large-scale precipitation deficit in February–September 2015 in northern and central Ethiopia. Using a gridded analysis that combines station data with satellite observations, it is estimated that the return period of this drought was more than 60 years (lower bound 95% confidence interval), with a most likely value of several hundred years. No trend is detected in the observations, but the large natural variability and short time series means large trends could go undetected in the observations. Two out of three large climate model ensembles that simulated rainfall reasonably well show no trend while the third shows an increased probability of drought. Taking the model spread into account the drought still cannot be clearly attributed to anthropogenic climate change, with the 95% confidence interval ranging from a probability decrease between preindustrial and today of a factor of 0.3 and an increase of a factor of 5 for a drought like this one or worse. A soil moisture dataset also shows a nonsignificant drying trend. According to ENSO correlations in the observations, the strong 2015 El Niño did increase the severity of the drought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-17-0274.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Philip, S., Kew, S. F., Jan van Oldenborgh, G., Otto, F., O’Keefe, S., Haustein, K., King, A., Zegeye, A., Eshetu, Z., Hailemariam, K., Singh, R., Jjemba, E., Funk, C., & Cullen, H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL)
  • a Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, Netherlands
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • b Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Government of Ethiopia (ET)
  • Climate Centre (NL)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Climate Central (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2018-03-15
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
2465-2486
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2765442616
Cited by
170
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
EUCLEIA (607085)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
drought attribution, climate change attribution, precipitation deficit, return periods, rainfall variability, climate model ensembles, soil moisture trends, El Niño, ENSO, food shortages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review