The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Extremes in Transient Climate Change Simulations
Abstract
Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes are examined in transient climate change simulations performed with the second-generation coupled global climate model of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis. Three-member ensembles were produced for the time period 1990–2100 using the IS92a, A2, and B2 emission scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The return values of annual extremes are estimated from a fitted generalized extreme value distribution with time-dependent location and scale parameters by the method of maximum likelihood. The L-moment return value estimates are revisited and found to be somewhat biased in the context of transient climate change simulations. The climate response is of similar magnitude in the integrations with the IS92a and A2 emission scenarios but more modest for the B2 scenario. Changes in temperature extremes are largely associated with changes in the location of the distribution of annual extremes without substantial changes in its shape over most of the globe. Exceptions are regions where land and ocean surface properties change drastically, such as the regions that experience sea ice and snow cover retreat. Globally averaged changes in warm extremes are comparable to the corresponding changes in annual mean daily maximum temperature, while globally averaged cold extremes warm up faster than annual mean daily minimum temperature. There are considerable regional differences between the magnitudes of changes in temperature extremes and the corresponding annual means. Changes in precipitation extremes are due to changes in both the location and scale of the extreme value distribution and exceed substantially the corresponding changes in the annual mean precipitation. Generally speaking, the warmer model climate becomes wetter and hydrologically more variable. The probability of precipitation events that are considered extreme at the beginning of the simulations is increased by a factor of about 2 by the end of the twenty-first century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values
Coles, S. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0 · Cited by 7,352
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350 · cited 1×
““Resampling” approaches for estimating parameter uncertainties have become increasingly popular (Efron and Tibshirani 1993; Davison and Hinkley 1997).”
BackgroundCox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0 · Cited by 3,089
Cited by
Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes
Min, S.-K., Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W., & Hegerl, G. C. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09763 · Cited by 2,083
Self-citationKharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., & Hegerl, G. C. (2007) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli4066.1 · Cited by 1,103
Self-citationChanges in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble
Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., & Wehner, M. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationAdded value of CMIP6 over CMIP5 models in simulating Indian summer monsoon rainfall
Gusain, A., Ghosh, S., & Karmakar, S. (2020) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104680 · Cited by 408
On the Verification and Comparison of Extreme Rainfall Indices from Climate Models
Chen, C.-T., & Knutson, T. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1494.1 · Cited by 268
A Nonstationary Flood Frequency Analysis Method to Adjust for Future Climate Change and Urbanization
Gilroy, K. L., & McCuen, R. H. (2012) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.009 · Cited by 214
Very extreme seasonal precipitation in the NARCCAP ensemble: model performance and projections
Wehner, M. F. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1393-1 · Cited by 137
Do weak AR4 models bias projections of future climate changes over Australia?
Perkins, S. E., & Pitman, A. J. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9502-1 · Cited by 48
Das, J., & Umamahesh, N. V. (2017) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001571 · Cited by 41
Detection and attribution of changes in extreme temperatures at regional scale
Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Wan, H., Yan, J., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-15-0835.1 · Cited by 32
Estimating concurrent climate extremes: A conditional approach
Huang, W. K., Monahan, A. H., & Zwiers, F. W. (2021) · Weather and Climate Extremes · doi:10.1016/j.wace.2021.100332 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kharin, V. V., & Zwiers, F. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-04-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1156-1173
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2085856887
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.