Air–sea interactions in the tropical Atlantic: a view based on lagged rotated maximum covariance analysis.
Open accessAbstract
The dominant air–sea feedbacks that are at play in the tropical Atlantic are revisited, using the 1958–2002 NCEP reanalysis. To separate between different modes of variability and distinguish between cause and effect, a lagged rotated maximum covariance analysis (MCA) of monthly sea surface temperature (SST), wind, and surface heat flux anomalies is performed. The dominant mode is the ENSO-like zonal equatorial SST mode, which has its maximum amplitude in boreal summer and is a strongly coupled ocean–atmosphere mode sustained by a positive feedback between wind and SST. The turbulent heat flux feedback is negative, except west of 25°W where it is positive, but countered by a negative radiative feedback associated with the meridional displacement of the ITCZ. As the maximum covariance patterns change little between lead and lag conditions, the in-phase covariability between SST and the atmosphere can be used to infer the atmospheric response to the SST anomaly. The second climate mode involves an SST anomaly in the tropical North Atlantic, which is primarily generated by the surface heat flux and, in boreal winter, wind changes off the coast of Africa. After it has been generated, the SST anomaly is sustained in the deep Tropics by the positive wind–evaporation–SST feedback linked to the wind response to the SST. However, north of about 10°N where the SST anomaly is largest, the wind response is weak and the heat flux feedback is negative, thus damping the SST anomaly. As the in-phase maximum covariance patterns primarily reflect the atmospheric forcing of the SST, simultaneous correlations cannot be used to describe the atmospheric response to the SST anomaly, except in the deep Tropics. Using instead the maximum covariance patterns when SST leads the atmosphere reconciles the results of recent atmospheric general circulation model experiments with the observations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Estimation of surface heat fluxes contains uncertainty that hampers the ability to accurately quantify air-sea thermodynamic interactions and heat budgets in the tropical Atlantic.
“The estimation contains uncertainty, which hampers our ability to accurately quantify air-sea thermodynamic interactions and heat budgets in the tropical Atlantic (Frankignoul and Kestenare, 2005;Pinker et al., 2014;Bentamy et al., 2017).”
From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Frankignoul and Kestenare, 2005
Section 2, “The data” (page unavailable), describes noisy observations, model biases in surface heat fluxes, and discrepancies between datasets. Section 6, “Summary and conclusions” (page unavailable), cautions that model biases and inadequate algorithms may affect the results. These passages support uncertainty in flux-based estimates, but the paper does not specifically say that this hampers accurate quantification of tropical Atlantic heat budgets. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Von Storch, H., and F. W. Zwiers, 1999: Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge University Press, 342 pp.
- Authors
- Frankignoul, C., & Kestenare, E.
- Affiliations
- Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (FR)
- Laboratoire d’Etudes en Geophysique et Oceanographie Spatiales (LEGOS), CNES/CNRS/IRD/UPS 14, Toulouse, France
- Corresponding author
- Frankignoul, Claude
- ORCID
- Frankignoul, Claude
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-09-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3874-3890
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W1978756756
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Institut Universitaire de France
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- ocean-atmosphere interaction, tropical Atlantic, radiative feedback, wind-evaporation-SST feedback, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, tropical North Atlantic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review