The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Climate Sensitivity and Its Components Diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget Data
Open accessAbstract
One of the major uncertainties in the ability to predict future climate change, and hence its impacts, is the lack of knowledge of the earth’s climate sensitivity. Here, data are combined from the 1985–96 Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) with surface temperature change information and estimates of radiative forcing to diagnose the climate sensitivity. Importantly, the estimate is completely independent of climate model results. A climate feedback parameter of 2.3 ± 1.4 W m−2 K−1 is found. This corresponds to a 1.0–4.1-K range for the equilibrium warming due to a doubling of carbon dioxide (assuming Gaussian errors in observable parameters, which is approximately equivalent to a uniform “prior” in feedback parameter). The uncertainty range is due to a combination of the short time period for the analysis as well as uncertainties in the surface temperature time series and radiative forcing time series, mostly the former. Radiative forcings may not all be fully accounted for; however, an argument is presented that the estimate of climate sensitivity is still likely to be representative of longer-term climate change. The methodology can be used to 1) retrieve shortwave and longwave components of climate feedback and 2) suggest clear-sky and cloud feedback terms. There is preliminary evidence of a neutral or even negative longwave feedback in the observations, suggesting that current climate models may not be representing some processes correctly if they give a net positive longwave feedback.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity
Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A., Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A., Thorpe, R. B., Lowe, J. A., Johns, T. C., & Williams, K. D. (2004) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2003gl018747 · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationProbabilistic climate change projections using neural networks
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., & Plattner, G.-K. (2003) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0345-1 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates
Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., & Knutti, R. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1385 · Cited by 788
The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes
Knutti, R., & Hegerl, G. C. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo337 · Cited by 490
Highly efficient methane biocatalysis revealed in a methanotrophic bacterium
Kalyuzhnaya, M. G., Yang, S., Rozova, O. N., Smalley, N. E., Clubb, J., Lamb, A., Gowda, G. A. N., Raftery, D., Fu, Y., Bringel, F., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3785 · Cited by 450
How reliable are climate models?
Räisänen, J. (2007) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v59i1.14859 · Cited by 356
Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social-economic-environmental system
Davies, E. G. R., & Simonovic, S. P. (2011) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.010 · Cited by 262
Selective environmental stress from sulphur emitted by continental flood basalt eruptions
Schmidt, A., Skeffington, R. A., Thordarson, T., Self, S., Forster, P. M., Rap, A., Ridgwell, A., Fowler, D., Wilson, M., Mann, G. W., et al. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2588 · Cited by 122
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Forster, P. M. F., & Gregory, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2131765612
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.