Cited by 197Climate variability and modelsClimate Change and GeoengineeringClimate Change Policy and Economics

Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks

Open access
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Plattner, G.-K.·2003·Climate Dynamics

Abstract

Anticipated future warming of the climate system increases the need for accurate climate projections. A central problem are the large uncertainties associated with these model projections, and that uncertainty estimates are often based on expert judgment rather than objective quantitative methods. Further, important climate model parameters are still given as poorly constrained ranges that are partly inconsistent with the observed warming during the industrial period. Here we present a neural network based climate model substitute that increases the efficiency of large climate model ensembles by at least an order of magnitude. Using the observed surface warming over the industrial period and estimates of global ocean heat uptake as constraints for the ensemble, this method estimates ranges for climate sensitivity and radiative forcing that are consistent with observations. In particular, negative values for the uncertain indirect aerosol forcing exceeding –1.2 Wm–2 can be excluded with high confidence. A parameterization to account for the uncertainty in the future carbon cycle is introduced, derived separately from a carbon cycle model. This allows us to quantify the effect of the feedback between oceanic and terrestrial carbon uptake and global warming on global temperature projections. Finally, probability density functions for the surface warming until year 2100 for two illustrative emission scenarios are calculated, taking into account uncertainties in the carbon cycle, radiative forcing, climate sensitivity, model parameters and the observed temperature records. We find that warming exceeds the surface warming range projected by IPCC for almost half of the ensemble members. Projection uncertainties are only consistent with IPCC if a model-derived upper limit of about 5 K is assumed for climate sensitivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00382-003-0345-1

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Church JA, Gregory JM (2001) Changes in sea level. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 639-693
  2. Legget J, Pepper WJ, Swart RJ (1992) Climate change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Ch Emissions Scenarios for IPCC: an Update. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 69-95
  3. Shine KP, Derwent RG, Wuebbles DJ, Morcrette JJ (1995) Radi- ative forcing of climate. In: Houghton JY, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) Climate change, the IPCC scientific assess- ment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., & Plattner, G.-K.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Knutti, R.
Venue
Climate Dynamics
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
21
Issue
3-4
Pages
257-272
ISSN
  • 0930-7575 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0894
OpenAlex
W2167220187
Cited by
197
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Climate Dynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change projections, neural network surrogate model, climate model ensembles, climate sensitivity, radiative forcing, carbon cycle uncertainty, ocean heat uptake, surface warming, probability density function, emission scenarios, IPCC projections, model parameter uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review