The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The NCEP Climate Forecast System
Open accessAbstract
The Climate Forecast System (CFS), the fully coupled ocean–land–atmosphere dynamical seasonal prediction system, which became operational at NCEP in August 2004, is described and evaluated in this paper. The CFS provides important advances in operational seasonal prediction on a number of fronts. For the first time in the history of U.S. operational seasonal prediction, a dynamical modeling system has demonstrated a level of skill in forecasting U.S. surface temperature and precipitation that is comparable to the skill of the statistical methods used by the NCEP Climate Prediction Center (CPC). This represents a significant improvement over the previous dynamical modeling system used at NCEP. Furthermore, the skill provided by the CFS spatially and temporally complements the skill provided by the statistical tools. The availability of a dynamical modeling tool with demonstrated skill should result in overall improvement in the operational seasonal forecasts produced by CPC. The atmospheric component of the CFS is a lower-resolution version of the Global Forecast System (GFS) that was the operational global weather prediction model at NCEP during 2003. The ocean component is the GFDL Modular Ocean Model version 3 (MOM3). There are several important improvements inherent in the new CFS relative to the previous dynamical forecast system. These include (i) the atmosphere–ocean coupling spans almost all of the globe (as opposed to the tropical Pacific only); (ii) the CFS is a fully coupled modeling system with no flux correction (as opposed to the previous uncoupled “tier-2” system, which employed multiple bias and flux corrections); and (iii) a set of fully coupled retrospective forecasts covering a 24-yr period (1981–2004), with 15 forecasts per calendar month out to nine months into the future, have been produced with the CFS. These 24 years of fully coupled retrospective forecasts are of paramount importance to the proper calibration (bias correction) of subsequent operational seasonal forecasts. They provide a meaningful a priori estimate of model skill that is critical in determining the utility of the real-time dynamical forecast in the operational framework. The retrospective dataset also provides a wealth of information for researchers to study interactive atmosphere–land–ocean processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., et al. (1996) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:tnyrp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 28,360
Self-citationNCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2)
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., & Potter, G. L. (2002) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-83-11-1631 · Cited by 5,771
Self-citationAn Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for Climate
Reynolds, R. W., Rayner, N. A., Smith, T. M., Stokes, D. C., & Wang, W. (2002) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1609:aiisas>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,559
Self-citationOceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., & Doney, S. C. (1994) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/94rg01872 · Cited by 4,443
Xie, P., & Arkin, P. A. (1997) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2539:gpayma>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,307
Self-citationThe NCEP–NCAR 50–Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD–ROM and Documentation
Kistler, R. E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G. H., Woollen, J. S., Kalnay, E., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V. E., et al. (2001) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247:tnnyrm>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 4,212
Self-citationIsopycnal Mixing in Ocean Circulation Models
Gent, P. R., & Mcwilliams, J. C. (1990) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020<0150:imiocm>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,149
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F. B., & Wood, R. A. (2000) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s003820050010 · Cited by 2,578
Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model
Hong, S.-Y., & Pan, H.-L. (1996) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:nblvdi>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,239
Self-citationUsing Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.
Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Polakowski, M. (2005) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr2906.1 · Cited by 1,915
Cited by
The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J., Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.776 · Cited by 3,518
Was there a basis for anticipating the 2010 Russian heat wave?
Dole, R., Hoerling, M., Perlwitz, J., Eischeid, J., Pegion, P., Zhang, T., Quan, X.-W., Xu, T., & Murray, D. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2010gl046582 · Cited by 699
Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status and prospects
Doblas‐Reyes, F. J., García‐Serrano, J., Lienert, F., Biescas, A. P., & Rodrigues, L. R. L. (2013) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.217 · Cited by 478
Wang, B., Lee, J.-Y., Kang, I.-S., Shukla, J., Park, C.-K., Kumar, A., Schemm, J., Cocke, S., Kug, J.-S., Luo, J.-J., et al. (2009) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0460-0 · Cited by 409
Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package
Planton, Y. Y., Guilyardi, E., Wittenberg, A. T., Lee, J., Gleckler, P. J., Bayr, T., McGregor, S., McPhaden, M. J., Power, S., Roehrig, R., et al. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-19-0337.1 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Saha, S., Nadiga, S., Thiaw, C., Wang, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Van den Dool, H. M., Pan, H.-L., Moorthi, S., Behringer, D., Stokes, D., Peña, M., Lord, S., White, G., Ebisuzaki, W., Peng, P., & Xie, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3483-3517
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W1985114715
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 44.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NCEP Climate Forecast System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli3812.1
- The paper
- Saha, S., Nadiga, S., Thiaw, C., Wang, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Van den Dool, H. M., Pan, H.-L., Moorthi, S., Behringer, D., Stokes, D., Peña, M., Lord, S., White, G., Ebisuzaki, W., Peng, P., & Xie, P. (2006). The NCEP Climate Forecast System. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3812.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.