Cited by 5,771Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

NCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2)

Open access
Kanamitsu, Masao, Ebisuzaki, Wesley, Woollen, Jack, Yang, Shi-Keng, Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., Potter, G. L.·2002·Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Abstract

The NCEP–DOE Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) reanalysis is a follow-on project to the “50-year” (1948–present) NCEP–NCAR Reanalysis Project. NCEP–DOE AMIP-II re-analysis covers the “20-year” satellite period of 1979 to the present and uses an updated forecast model, updated data assimilation system, improved diagnostic outputs, and fixes for the known processing problems of the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis. Only minor differences are found in the primary analysis variables such as free atmospheric geopotential height and winds in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics, while significant improvements upon NCEP–NCAR reanalysis are made in land surface parameters and land–ocean fluxes. This analysis can be used as a supplement to the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis especially where the original analysis has problems. The differences between the two analyses also provide a measure of uncertainty in current analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/bams-83-11-1631

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]5. Campana, K. A., Y.-T. Hou, K. E. Mitchell, S.-K. Yang, and R. Cullather, 1994: Improved diagnostic cloud parameterization in NMC's global model. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Port- land, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 324-325.
  2. [25]25. Yang, S.-K., J. X. Wang, and A. J. Miller, 1998: A revisit of Global Energy Balance using NCEP/NCAR Re- analysis and Satellite Observations. Proc. First WCRP Int Conf. on Reanalysis, WMO TD No. 876, Silver Spring, MD, WMO, 37-40.
  3. [27]27. M. Kanamitsu, Y.-T. Hou, W. Ebisuzaki, and K. Campana, 2000: Upper tropospheric humidity from NCEP reanalysis and its impact on radiation fluxes. Proc. of the Second WCRP Int. Conf. on Reanalysis, WCRP-109, WMO/TD-985, Wokefield, Reading, United Kingdom, WMO, 95-98.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., & Potter, G. L.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kanamitsu, Masao
Venue
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2002-11
Volume
83
Issue
11
Pages
1631-1644
ISSN
  • 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0477
OpenAlex
W1989668498
Cited by
5,771
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 263 · 2023: 292 · 2022: 367 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 364 · 2019: 361 · 2018: 310 · 2017: 325 · 2016: 320 · 2015: 339 · 2014: 307 · 2013: 314 · 2012: 302
FWCI
34.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Keywords
NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, atmospheric reanalysis, data assimilation, land surface parameters, Northern Hemisphere extratropics, atmospheric winds, reanalysis uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review