Tropical Atlantic SST prediction with coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs.
Abstract
Variations in tropical Atlantic SST are an important factor in seasonal forecasts in the region and beyond. An analysis is given of the capabilities of the latest generation of coupled GCM seasonal forecast systems to predict tropical Atlantic SST anomalies. Skill above that of persistence is demonstrated in both the northern tropical and equatorial Atlantic, but not farther south. The inability of the coupled models to correctly represent the mean seasonal cycle is a major problem in attempts to forecast equatorial SST anomalies in the boreal summer. Even when forced with observed SST, atmosphere models have significant failings in this area. The quality of ocean initial conditions for coupled model forecasts is also a cause for concern, and the adequacy of the near-equatorial ocean observing system is in doubt. A multimodel approach improves forecast skill only modestly, and large errors remain in the southern tropical Atlantic. There is still much scope for improving forecasts of tropical Atlantic SST.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Predicting the AZM is particularly challenging, with dynamical forecasts often matched or even outperformed by persistence forecasts.
“Predicting the AZM is particularly challenging, with dynamical forecasts often matched or even outperformed by persistence forecasts (Stockdale et al., 2006;Richter et al., 2017).”
From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Stockdale et al., 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Stockdale, T. N., Balmaseda, M. A., & Vidard, A.
- Affiliations
- ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6047-6061
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2009687803
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Keywords
- tropical Atlantic sea surface temperature, sea surface temperature anomalies, seasonal forecasting, forecast skill, equatorial Atlantic, boreal summer, ocean initial conditions, ocean observing systems, multi-model ensemble
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review