The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating Shortwave Radiative Forcing and Response in Climate Models
Open accessAbstract
Feedback analysis in climate models commonly involves decomposing any change in the system’s energy balance into radiative forcing terms due to prescribed changes, and response terms due to the radiative effects of changes in model variables such as temperature, water vapor, clouds, sea ice, and snow. The established “partial radiative perturbation” (PRP) method allows an accurate separation of these terms, but requires processing large volumes of model output with an offline version of the model’s radiation code. Here, we propose an “approximate PRP” (APRP) method for the shortwave that provides an accurate estimate of the radiative perturbation, but derived from a quite modest amount of monthly mean model output. The APRP method is based on a simplified shortwave radiative model of the atmosphere, where surface absorption and atmospheric scattering and absorption are represented by means of three parameters that are diagnosed for overcast and clear-sky portions of each model grid cell. The accuracy of the method is gauged relative to full PRP calculations in two experiments: one in which carbon dioxide concentration is doubled and another in which conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) are simulated. The approximate PRP method yields a shortwave cloud feedback accurate in the global mean to within 7%. Forcings and feedbacks due to surface albedo and noncloud atmospheric constituents are also well approximated with errors of order 5%–10%. Comparison of two different model simulations of the LGM shows that the regional and global differences in their ice sheet albedo forcing fields are clearly captured by the APRP method. Hence this method is an efficient and satisfactory tool for studying and intercomparing shortwave forcing and feedbacks in climate models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po‐Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., & Taylor, K. E. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl085782 · Cited by 1,747
Self-citationGlacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., & Poulsen, C. J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x · Cited by 573
Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions
Goosse, H., Kay, J. E., Armour, K. C., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Chepfer, H., Docquier, D., Jonko, A., Kushner, P. J., Lecomte, O., Massonnet, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04173-0 · Cited by 531
Shell, K. M., Kiehl, J. T., & Shields, C. A. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli2044.1 · Cited by 386
Forster, P. M., Smith, C. J., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Hauser, M., Ribes, A., Rosen, D., Gillett, N., Palmer, M. D., et al. (2023) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023 · Cited by 366
Extratropical Influence on ITCZ Shifts in Slab Ocean Simulations of Global Warming
Frierson, D. M. W., & Hwang, Y.-T. (2012) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00116.1 · Cited by 309
Hwang, Y., Frierson, D. M. W., & Kang, S. M. (2013) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/grl.50502 · Cited by 266
Understanding rapid adjustments to diverse forcing agents
Smith, C. J., Kramer, R. J., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M., Soden, B. J., Andrews, T., Boucher, O., Faluvegi, G., Fläschner, D., Hodnebrog, Ø., et al. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2018gl079826 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, K. E., Crucifix, M., Braconnot, P., Hewitt, C. D., Doutriaux, C., Broccoli, A. J., Mitchell, J. F. B., & Webb, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2530-2543
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2037349164
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.