The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products over Sparsely Gauged African River Basins
Abstract
Six satellite-based rainfall estimates (SRFE)—namely, Climate Prediction Center (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH), the Rainfall Estimation Algorithm, version 2 (RFE2.0), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42, Goddard profiling algorithm, version 6 (GPROF 6.0), Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN), Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation moving vector with Kalman filter (GSMap MVK), and one reanalysis product [the interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim)]—were validated against 205 rain gauge stations over four African river basins (Zambezi, Volta, Juba–Shabelle, and Baro–Akobo). Validation focused on rainfall characteristics relevant to hydrological applications, such as annual catchment totals, spatial distribution patterns, seasonality, number of rainy days per year, and timing and volume of heavy rainfall events. Validation was done at three spatially aggregated levels: point-to-pixel, subcatchment, and river basin for the period 2003–06. Performance of satellite-based rainfall estimation (SRFE) was assessed using standard statistical methods and visual inspection. SRFE showed 1) accuracy in reproducing precipitation on a monthly basis during the dry season, 2) an ability to replicate bimodal precipitation patterns, 3) superior performance over the tropical wet and dry zone than over semiarid or mountainous regions, 4) increasing uncertainty in the estimation of higher-end percentiles of daily precipitation, 5) low accuracy in detecting heavy rainfall events over semiarid areas, 6) general underestimation of heavy rainfall events, and 7) overestimation of number of rainy days in the tropics. In respect to SRFE performance, GPROF 6.0 and GSMaP-MKV were the least accurate, and RFE 2.0 and TRMM 3B42 were the most accurate. These results allow discrimination between the available products and the reduction of potential errors caused by selecting a product that is not suitable for particular morphoclimatic conditions. For hydrometeorological applications, results support the use of a performance-based merged product that combines the strength of multiple SRFEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.828 · Cited by 24,480
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., & Stocker, E. F. (2007) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm560.1 · Cited by 6,767
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A. T. C., Ferraro, R. R., Xie, P., Janowiak, J. E., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D. T., et al. (2003) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:tvgpcp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,425
Joyce, R. J., Janowiak, J. E., Arkin, P. A., & Xie, P. (2004) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:camtpg>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,208
Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall
Goovaerts, P. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00144-x · Cited by 1,544
Xie, P., & Arkin, P. A. (1996) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0840:aogmpu>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,339
Evaluation of PERSIANN System Satellite–Based Estimates of Tropical Rainfall
Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K.-L., Gao, X., Gupta, H. V., Imam, B., & Braithwaite, D. (2000) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2035:eopsse>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 1,237
Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks
Hsu, K.-L., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, H. V. (1997) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1176:pefrsi>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,096
Ebert, E. E., Janowiak, J. E., & Kidd, C. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-1-47 · Cited by 1,029
Cited by
Evaluation and comparison of satellite-based rainfall products in Burkina Faso, West Africa
Dembélé, M., & Zwart, S. J. (2016) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1207258 · Cited by 318
Brocca, L., Massari, C., Pellarin, T., Filippucci, P., Ciabatta, L., Camici, S., Kerr, Y. H., & Fernández-Prieto, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69343-x · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Thiemig, V., Rojas, R., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Levizzani, V., & De Roo, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1760-1783
- ISSN
- 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-755X
- OpenAlex
- W2074338125
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products over Sparsely Gauged African River Basins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jhm-d-12-032.1
- The paper
- Thiemig, V., Rojas, R., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Levizzani, V., & De Roo, A. (2012). Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products over Sparsely Gauged African River Basins. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-12-032.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.