The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Destruction of Potential Vorticity by Winds
Abstract
The destruction of potential vorticity (PV) at ocean fronts by wind stress–driven frictional forces is examined using PV flux formalism and numerical simulations. When a front is forced by “downfront” winds, that is, winds blowing in the direction of the frontal jet, a nonadvective frictional PV flux that is upward at the sea surface is induced. The flux extracts PV out of the ocean, leading to the formation of a boundary layer thicker than the Ekman layer, with nearly zero PV and nonzero stratification. The PV reduction is not only active in the Ekman layer but is transmitted through the boundary layer via secondary circulations that exchange low PV from the Ekman layer with high PV from the pycnocline. Extraction of PV from the pycnocline by the secondary circulations results in an upward advective PV flux at the base of the boundary layer that scales with the surface, nonadvective, frictional PV flux and that leads to the deepening of the layer. At fronts forced by both downfront winds and a destabilizing atmospheric buoyancy flux FBatm, the critical parameter that determines whether the wind or the buoyancy flux is the dominant cause for PV destruction is (H/δe)(FBwind/FBatm), where H and δe are the mixed layer and Ekman layer depths, FBwind = S2τo/(ρof ), S2 is the magnitude of the lateral buoyancy gradient of the front, τo is the downfront component of the wind stress, ρo is a reference density, and f is the Coriolis parameter. When this parameter is greater than 1, PV destruction by winds dominates and may play an important role in the formation of mode water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., & Doney, S. C. (1994) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/94rg01872 · Cited by 4,443
Cited by
Submesoscale currents in the ocean
McWilliams, J. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0117 · Cited by 1,081
Parameterization of Mixed Layer Eddies. Part I: Theory and Diagnosis
Fox-Kemper, B., Ferrari, R., & Hallberg, R. (2008) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/2007jpo3792.1 · Cited by 802
Mixed Layer Instabilities and Restratification
Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R., & Fox-Kemper, B. (2007) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/jpo3101.1 · Cited by 685
Submesoscale processes and dynamics
Thomas, L. N., Tandon, A., & Mahadevan, A. (2008) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/177gm04 · Cited by 606
Self-citationBringing physics to life at the submesoscale
Lévy, M., Ferrari, R., Franks, P. J. S., Martin, A. P., & Rivière, P. (2012) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2012gl052756 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, L. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Oceanography
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2457-2466
- ISSN
- 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0485
- OpenAlex
- W2096763060
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Destruction of Potential Vorticity by Winds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jpo2830.1
- The paper
- Thomas, L. N. (2005). Destruction of Potential Vorticity by Winds. Journal of Physical Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo2830.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.