The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Jets of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current South of Australia*
Open accessAbstract
Maps of the gradient of sea surface height (SSH) and sea surface temperature (SST) reveal that the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) consists of multiple jets or frontal filaments. The braided and patchy nature of the gradient fields seems at odds with the traditional view, derived from hydrographic sections, that the ACC is made up of three continuous circumpolar fronts. By applying a nonlinear fitting procedure to 638 weekly maps of SSH gradient (∇SSH), it is shown that the distribution of maxima in ∇SSH (i.e., fronts) is strongly peaked at particular values of absolute SSH (i.e., streamlines). The association between the jets and particular streamlines persists despite strong topographic and eddy–mean flow interactions, which cause the jets to merge, diverge, and fluctuate in intensity along their path. The SSH values corresponding to each frontal branch are nearly constant over the sector of the Southern Ocean between 100°E and 180°. The front positions inferred from SSH agree closely with positions inferred from hydrographic sections using traditional water mass criteria. Recognition of the multiple branches of the Southern Ocean fronts helps to reconcile differences between front locations determined by previous studies. Weekly maps of SSH are used to characterize the structure and variability of the ACC fronts and filaments. The path, width, and intensity of the frontal branches are influenced strongly by the bathymetry. The “meander envelopes” of the fronts are narrow on the northern slope of topographic ridges, where the sloping topography reinforces the β effect, and broader over abyssal plains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2
Ducet, N., Le Traon, P. Y., & Reverdin, G. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2000jc900063 · Cited by 1,725
Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane
Rhines, P. B. (1975) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112075001504 · Cited by 1,177
Rhines, P. B. (1994) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.166011 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Sokolov, S., & Rintoul, S. R. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2008jc005108 · Cited by 484
Self-citationMultiple Zonal Jets in a Differentially Heated Rotating Annulus
Smith, C. A., Speer, K. G., & Griffiths, R. W. (2014) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-13-0255.1 · Cited by 31
Beta-plane turbulence: Experiments with altimetry
Zhang, Y., & Afanasyev, Y. D. (2014) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.4864339 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Sokolov, S., & Rintoul, S. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Oceanography
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1394-1412
- ISSN
- 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0485
- OpenAlex
- W2070083030
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Jets of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current South of Australia*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jpo3111.1
- The paper
- Sokolov, S., & Rintoul, S. R. (2007). Multiple Jets of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current South of Australia*. Journal of Physical Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo3111.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.