The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities
Abstract
Since April 2007, the numerical weather prediction model, COSMO (Consortium for Small Scale Modelling), has been used operationally in a convection-permitting configuration, named COSMO-DE, at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD; German weather service). Here the authors discuss the model changes that were necessary for the convective scale, and report on the experience from the first years of operational application of the model. For COSMO-DE the ability of the numerical solver to treat small-scale structures has been improved by using a Runge–Kutta method, which allows for the use of higher-order upwind advection schemes. The one-moment cloud microphysics parameterization has been extended by a graupel class, and adaptations for describing evaporation of rain and stratiform precipitation processes were made. Comparisons with a much more sophisticated two-moment scheme showed only minor differences in most cases with the exception of strong squall-line situations. Whereas the deep convection parameterization was switched off completely, small-scale shallow convection was still parameterized by the appropriate part of the Tiedtke scheme. During the first year of operational use, convective events in synoptically driven situations were satisfactorily simulated. Also the daily cycles of summertime 10-m wind and 1-h precipitation sums were well captured. However, it became evident that the boundary layer description had to be adapted to enhance convection initiation in airmass convection situations. Here the asymptotic Blackadar length scale l∞ had proven to be a sensitive parameter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heavy precipitation in a changing climate: Does short‐term summer precipitation increase faster?
Ban, N., Schmidli, J., & Schär, C. (2015) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2014gl062588 · Cited by 460
Dowell, D. C., Alexander, C. R., James, E. P., Weygandt, S. S., Benjamin, S. G., Manikin, G. S., Blake, B. T., Brown, J. M., Olson, J. B., Hu, M., et al. (2022) · Weather and Forecasting · doi:10.1175/waf-d-21-0151.1 · Cited by 399
Entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection: an overview
de Rooy, W. C., Bechtold, P., Fröhlich, K., Hohenegger, C., Jonker, H., Mironov, D., Pier Siebesma, A., Teixeira, J., & Yano, J. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.1959 · Cited by 384
A contrail cirrus prediction model
Schumann, U. (2012) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-5-543-2012 · Cited by 229
Omanovic, N., Goger, B., & Lohmann, U. (2024) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-24-14145-2024 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., & Reinhardt, T.
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3887-3905
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W2015241713
- Cited by
- 1,284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr-d-10-05013.1
- The paper
- Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., & Reinhardt, T. (2011). Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-10-05013.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.