The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local and Mesoscale Impacts of Wind Farms as Parameterized in a Mesoscale NWP Model
Abstract
A new wind farm parameterization has been developed for the mesoscale numerical weather prediction model, the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF). The effects of wind turbines are represented by imposing a momentum sink on the mean flow; transferring kinetic energy into electricity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). The parameterization improves upon previous models, basing the atmospheric drag of turbines on the thrust coefficient of a modern commercial turbine. In addition, the source of TKE varies with wind speed, reflecting the amount of energy extracted from the atmosphere by the turbines that does not produce electrical energy. Analyses of idealized simulations of a large offshore wind farm are presented to highlight the perturbation induced by the wind farm and its interaction with the atmospheric boundary layer (BL). A wind speed deficit extended throughout the depth of the neutral boundary layer, above and downstream from the farm, with a long wake of 60-km e-folding distance. Within the farm the wind speed deficit reached a maximum reduction of 16%. A maximum increase of TKE, by nearly a factor of 7, was located within the farm. The increase in TKE extended to the top of the BL above the farm due to vertical transport and wind shear, significantly enhancing turbulent momentum fluxes. The TKE increased by a factor of 2 near the surface within the farm. Near-surface winds accelerated by up to 11%. These results are consistent with the few results available from observations and large-eddy simulations, indicating this parameterization provides a reasonable means of exploring potential downwind impacts of large wind farms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grand challenges in the science of wind energy
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2027 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationWind-Turbine and Wind-Farm Flows: A Review
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., & Shamsoddin, S. (2020) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0 · Cited by 1,117
The future of forecasting for renewable energy
Sweeney, C., Bessa, R. J., Browell, J., & Pinson, P. (2020) · WIREs Energy and Environment · doi:10.1002/wene.365 · Cited by 292
First in situ evidence of wakes in the far field behind offshore wind farms
Platis, A., Siedersleben, S. K., Bange, J., Lampert, A., Bärfuss, K., Hankers, R., Cañadillas, B., Foreman, R., Schulz-Stellenfleth, J., Djath, B., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20389-y · Cited by 266
Impact of wind-energy generation on climate: A rising spectre
Abbasi, S. A., Tabassum-Abbasi, & Abbasi, T. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.262 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitch, A. C., Olson, J. B., Lundquist, J. K., Dudhia, J., Gupta, A. K., Michalakes, J., & Barstad, I.
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2012-09-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3017-3038
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W2051841309
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local and Mesoscale Impacts of Wind Farms as Parameterized in a Mesoscale NWP Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr-d-11-00352.1
- The paper
- Fitch, A. C., Olson, J. B., Lundquist, J. K., Dudhia, J., Gupta, A. K., Michalakes, J., & Barstad, I. (2012). Local and Mesoscale Impacts of Wind Farms as Parameterized in a Mesoscale NWP Model. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-11-00352.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.