Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts Based on Reforecast Analogs: Theory and Application

Hamill, Thomas M., Whitaker, Jeffrey S.·2006·Monthly Weather Review

Abstract

A general theory is proposed for the statistical correction of weather forecasts based on observed analogs. An estimate is sought for the probability density function (pdf) of the observed state, given today’s numerical forecast. Assume that an infinite set of reforecasts (hindcasts) and associated observations are available and that the climate is stable. Assume that it is possible to find a set of past model forecast states that are nearly identical to the current forecast state. With the dates of these past forecasts, the asymptotically correct probabilistic forecast can be formed from the distribution of observed states on those dates. Unfortunately, this general theory of analogs is not useful for estimating the global pdf with a limited set of reforecasts, for the chance of finding even one effectively identical forecast analog in that limited set is vanishingly small, and the climate is not stable. Nonetheless, approximations can be made to this theory to make it useful for statistically correcting weather forecasts. For instance, when estimating the state in a local region, choose the dates of analogs based on a pattern match of the local weather forecast; with a few decades of reforecasts, there are usually many close analogs. Several approximate analog techniques are then tested for their ability to skillfully calibrate probabilistic forecasts of 24-h precipitation amount. A 25-yr set of reforecasts from a reduced-resolution global forecast model is used. The analog techniques find past ensemble-mean forecasts in a local region that are similar to today’s ensemble-mean forecasts in that region. Probabilistic forecasts are formed from the analyzed weather on the dates of the past analogs. All of the analog techniques provide dramatic improvements in the Brier skill score relative to basing probabilities on the raw ensemble counts or the counts corrected for bias. However, the analog techniques did not produce guidance that was much more skillful than that produced by a logistic regression technique. Among the analog techniques tested, it was determined that small improvements to the baseline analog technique that matches ensemble-mean precipitation forecasts are possible. Forecast skill can be improved slightly by matching the ranks of the mean forecasts rather than the raw mean forecasts by using highly localized search regions for shorter-term forecasts and larger search regions for longer forecasts, by matching precipitable water in addition to precipitation amount, and by spatially smoothing the probabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/mwr3237.1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Hamill, T. M., & Whitaker, J. S.
Venue
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
134
Issue
11
Pages
3209-3229
ISSN
  • 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0493
OpenAlex
W2128469217
Cited by
313
References
26
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts Based on Reforecast Analogs: Theory and Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr3237.1
The paper
Hamill, T. M., & Whitaker, J. S. (2006). Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts Based on Reforecast Analogs: Theory and Application. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr3237.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.