The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Using Bayesian Model Averaging
Open accessAbstract
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a statistical way of postprocessing forecast ensembles to create predictive probability density functions (PDFs) for weather quantities. It represents the predictive PDF as a weighted average of PDFs centered on the individual bias-corrected forecasts, where the weights are posterior probabilities of the models generating the forecasts and reflect the forecasts’ relative contributions to predictive skill over a training period. It was developed initially for quantities whose PDFs can be approximated by normal distributions, such as temperature and sea level pressure. BMA does not apply in its original form to precipitation, because the predictive PDF of precipitation is nonnormal in two major ways: it has a positive probability of being equal to zero, and it is skewed. In this study BMA is extended to probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. The predictive PDF corresponding to one ensemble member is a mixture of a discrete component at zero and a gamma distribution. Unlike methods that predict the probability of exceeding a threshold, BMA gives a full probability distribution for future precipitation. The method was applied to daily 48-h forecasts of 24-h accumulated precipitation in the North American Pacific Northwest in 2003–04 using the University of Washington mesoscale ensemble. It yielded predictive distributions that were calibrated and sharp. It also gave probability of precipitation forecasts that were much better calibrated than those based on consensus voting of the ensemble members. It gave better estimates of the probability of high-precipitation events than logistic regression on the cube root of the ensemble mean.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Self-citationMcLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences
Ramsey, P. H. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1996.10484553 · Cited by 7,601
The EM Algorithm and Extensions
Kushary, D. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485534 · Cited by 5,417
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1976) · Cited by 4,517
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118 · cited 1×
“a. BMA BMA (Leamer 1978; Kass and Raftery 1995; Hoeting et al. 1999) was originally developed as a way to combine inferences and predictions from multiple statistical models, and was applied to statistical linear regression and related models in social and health sciences.”
MethodSelf-citationOn the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics
Fisher, R. A. (1922) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1922.0009 · Cited by 4,039
On the Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm
Wu, C. F. J. (1983) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346060 · Cited by 3,269
Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.
Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Polakowski, M. (2005) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr2906.1 · Cited by 1,915
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of advances in flash flood forecasting
Hapuarachchi, H. A. P., Wang, Q. J., & Pagano, T. C. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.8040 · Cited by 560
Vrugt, J. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004838 · Cited by 334
Bayesian Modeling of Uncertainty in Ensembles of Climate Models
Smith, R. L., Tebaldi, C., Nychka, D., & Mearns, L. O. (2009) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0007 · Cited by 225
Scheuerer, M., Switanek, M. B., Worsnop, R. P., & Hamill, T. M. (2020) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-20-0096.1 · Cited by 82
Detecting local risk factors for residual malaria in northern Ghana using Bayesian model averaging
Millar, J., Psychas, P., Abuaku, B., Ahorlu, C., Amratia, P., Koram, K., Oppong, S., & Valle, D. (2018) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2491-2 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Sloughter, J. M. L., Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., & Fraley, C.
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3209-3220
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W2013765062
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Using Bayesian Model Averaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr3441.1
- The paper
- Sloughter, J. M. L., Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., & Fraley, C. (2007). Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Using Bayesian Model Averaging. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr3441.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.