The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reexamination of Tropical Cyclone Wind–Pressure Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Tropical cyclone wind–pressure relationships are reexamined using 15 yr of minimum sea level pressure estimates, numerical analysis fields, and best-track intensities. Minimum sea level pressure is estimated from aircraft reconnaissance or measured from dropwindsondes, and maximum wind speeds are interpolated from best-track maximum 1-min wind speed estimates. The aircraft data were collected primarily in the Atlantic but also include eastern and central North Pacific cases. Global numerical analyses were used to estimate tropical cyclone size and environmental pressure associated with each observation. Using this dataset (3801 points), the influences of latitude, tropical cyclone size, environmental pressure, and intensification trend on the tropical cyclone wind–pressure relationships were examined. Findings suggest that latitude, size, and environmental pressure, which all can be quantified in an operational and postanalysis setting, are related to predictable changes in the wind–pressure relationships. These factors can be combined into equations that estimate winds given pressure and estimate pressure given winds with greater accuracy than current methodologies. In independent testing during the 2005 hurricane season (524 cases), these new wind–pressure relationships resulted in mean absolute errors of 5.3 hPa and 6.2 kt compared with the 7.7 hPa and 9.0 kt that resulted from using the standard Atlantic Dvorak wind–pressure relationship. These new wind–pressure relationships are then used to evaluate several operational wind–pressure relationships. These intercomparisons have led to several recommendations for operational tropical cyclone centers and those interested in reanalyzing past tropical cyclone events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.
Emanuel, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03906 · Cited by 4,013
Cited by
Environmental Factors Affecting Tropical Cyclone Power Dissipation
Emanuel, K. (2007) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1571.1 · Cited by 309
A Technique for Combining Global Tropical Cyclone Best Track Data
Kruk, M. C., Knapp, K. R., & Levinson, D. H. (2010) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/2009jtecha1267.1 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Knaff, J. A., & Zehr, R. M.
- Venue
- Weather and Forecasting
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-88
- ISSN
- 0882-8156 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0434
- OpenAlex
- W2104975388
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reexamination of Tropical Cyclone Wind–Pressure Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/waf965.1
- The paper
- Knaff, J. A., & Zehr, R. M. (2007). Reexamination of Tropical Cyclone Wind–Pressure Relationships. Weather and Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1175/waf965.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.