The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge
Open accessAbstract
Coproduction of knowledge is believed to be an effective way to produce usable climate science knowledge through a process of collaboration between scientists and decision makers. While the general principles of coproduction—establishing long-term relationships between scientists and stakeholders, ensuring two-way communication between both groups, and keeping the focus on the production of usable science—are well understood, the mechanisms for achieving those goals have been discussed less. It is proposed here that a more deliberate approach to building the relationships and communication channels between scientists and stakeholders will yield better outcomes. The authors present five approaches to collaborative research that can be used to structure a coproduction process that each suit different types of research or management questions, decision-making contexts, and resources and skills available to contribute to the process of engagement. By using established collaborative research approaches scientists can be more effective in learning from stakeholders, can be more confident when engaging with stakeholders because there are guideposts to follow, and can assess both the process and outcomes of collaborative projects, which will help the whole community of stakeholder-engaged climate-scientists learn about coproduction of knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
Prospects for transdisciplinarity
Thompson Klein, J. (2004) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Understanding and managing connected extreme events
Raymond, C., Horton, R. M., Zscheischler, J., Martius, O., AghaKouchak, A., Balch, J., Bowen, S. G., Camargo, S. J., Hess, J., Kornhuber, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0790-4 · Cited by 708
Actionable knowledge and the art of engagement
Mach, K. J., Lemos, M. C., Meadow, A. M., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., Fieseler, C., Moss, R. H., Nichols, L., et al. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002 · Cited by 294
Self-citationFoundations of translational ecology
Enquist, C. A., Jackson, S. T., Garfin, G. M., Davis, F. W., Gerber, L. R., Littell, J. A., Tank, J. L., Terando, A. J., Wall, T. U., Halpern, B., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1733 · Cited by 273
Self-citationCo-creation of knowledge in agroecology
Utter, A., White, A., Méndez, V. E., & Morris, K. (2021) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00026 · Cited by 126
Use‐inspired science: making science usable by and useful to decision makers
Wall, T. U., McNie, E., & Garfin, G. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1735 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meadow, A. M., Ferguson, D. B., Guido, Z., Horangic, A., Owen, G., & Wall, T.
- Venue
- Weather, Climate, and Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-191
- ISSN
- 1948-8327 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-8335
- OpenAlex
- W2041617022
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/wcas-d-14-00050.1
- The paper
- Meadow, A. M., Ferguson, D. B., Guido, Z., Horangic, A., Owen, G., & Wall, T. (2015). Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of Climate Science Knowledge. Weather, Climate, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-14-00050.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.