The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science
Open accessAbstract
Resource managers and decision-makers are increasingly tasked with integrating climate change science into their decisions about resource management and policy development. This often requires climate scientists, resource managers, and decision-makers to work collaboratively throughout the research processes, an approach to knowledge development that is often called “coproduction of knowledge.” The goal of this paper is to synthesize the social science theory of coproduction of knowledge, the metrics currently used to evaluate usable or actionable science in several federal agencies, and insights from experienced climate researchers and program managers to develop a set of 45 indicators supporting an evaluation framework for coproduced usable climate science. Here the proposed indicators and results from two case studies that were used to test the indicators are presented, as well as lessons about the process of evaluating the coproduction of knowledge and collaboratively producing climate knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 · Cited by 1,620
Self-citationTo co-produce or not to co-produce
Lemos, M. C., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., Baja, K., Bednarek, A. T., Dewulf, A., Fieseler, C., Goodrich, K. A., Jagannathan, K., Klenk, N., et al. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0 · Cited by 391
Self-citationWilliams, S., & Doyon, A. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001 · Cited by 336
Actionable knowledge and the art of engagement
Mach, K. J., Lemos, M. C., Meadow, A. M., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., Fieseler, C., Moss, R. H., Nichols, L., et al. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002 · Cited by 294
Self-citationFoundations of translational ecology
Enquist, C. A., Jackson, S. T., Garfin, G. M., Davis, F. W., Gerber, L. R., Littell, J. A., Tank, J. L., Terando, A. J., Wall, T. U., Halpern, B., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1733 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wall, T. U., Meadow, A. M., & Horganic, A.
- Venue
- Weather, Climate, and Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-107
- ISSN
- 1948-8327 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-8335
- OpenAlex
- W2536252402
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/wcas-d-16-0008.1
- The paper
- Wall, T. U., Meadow, A. M., & Horganic, A. (2017). Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science. Weather, Climate, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-16-0008.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
